如何使用子进程模块杀死（或避免）僵尸进程

Question

When I kick off a python script from within another python script using the subprocess module, a zombie process is created when the subprocess "completes". I am unable to kill this subprocess unless I kill my parent python process.

Is there a way to kill the subprocess without killing the parent? I know I can do this by using wait(), but I need to run my script with no_wait().

Answer 1

A zombie process is not a real process; it's just a remaining entry in the process table until the parent process requests the child's return code. The actual process has ended and requires no other resources but said process table entry.

We probably need more information about the processes you run in order to actually help more.

However, in the case that your Python program knows when the child processes have ended (eg by reaching the end of the child stdout data), then you can safely call process.wait() :

import subprocess

process= subprocess.Popen( ('ls', '-l', '/tmp'), stdout=subprocess.PIPE)

for line in process.stdout:
        pass

subprocess.call( ('ps', '-l') )
process.wait()
print "after wait"
subprocess.call( ('ps', '-l') )

Example output:

$ python so2760652.py
F S   UID   PID  PPID  C PRI  NI ADDR SZ WCHAN  TTY          TIME CMD
0 S   501 21328 21326  0  80   0 -  1574 wait   pts/2    00:00:00 bash
0 S   501 21516 21328  0  80   0 -  1434 wait   pts/2    00:00:00 python
0 Z   501 21517 21516  0  80   0 -     0 exit   pts/2    00:00:00 ls <defunct>
0 R   501 21518 21516  0  80   0 -   608 -      pts/2    00:00:00 ps
after wait
F S   UID   PID  PPID  C PRI  NI ADDR SZ WCHAN  TTY          TIME CMD
0 S   501 21328 21326  0  80   0 -  1574 wait   pts/2    00:00:00 bash
0 S   501 21516 21328  0  80   0 -  1467 wait   pts/2    00:00:00 python
0 R   501 21519 21516  0  80   0 -   608 -      pts/2    00:00:00 ps

Otherwise, you can keep all the children in a list, and now and then .poll for their return codes. After every iteration, remember to remove from the list the children with return codes different than None (ie the finished ones).

Answer 2

Not using Popen.communicate() or call() will result in a zombie process.

If you don't need the output of the command, you can use subprocess.call() :

>>> import subprocess
>>> subprocess.call(['grep', 'jdoe', '/etc/passwd'])
0

If the output is important, you should use Popen() and communicate() to get the stdout and stderr.

>>> from subprocess import Popen, PIPE
>>> process = Popen(['ls', '-l', '/tmp'], stdout=PIPE, stderr=PIPE)
>>> stdout, stderr = process.communicate()
>>> stderr
''
>>> print stdout
total 0
-rw-r--r-- 1 jdoe jdoe 0 2010-05-03 17:05 bar
-rw-r--r-- 1 jdoe jdoe 0 2010-05-03 17:05 baz
-rw-r--r-- 1 jdoe jdoe 0 2010-05-03 17:05 foo

Answer 3

If you delete the subprocess object, using del to force garbage collection, that will cause the subprocess object to be deleted and then the defunct processes will go away without terminating your interpreter. You can try this out in the python command line interface first.

Answer 4

If you simply use subprocess.Popen , you'll be fine - here's how:

import subprocess

def spawn_some_children():
    subprocess.Popen(["sleep", "3"])
    subprocess.Popen(["sleep", "3"])
    subprocess.Popen(["sleep", "3"])

def do_some_stuff():
    spawn_some_children()
    # do some stuff
    print "children went out to play, now I can do my job..."
    # do more stuff

if __name__ == '__main__':
    do_some_stuff()

You can use .poll() on the object returned by Popen to check whether it finished (without waiting). If it returns None , the child is still running.

Make sure you don't keep references to the Popen objects - if you do, they will not be garbage collected, so you end up with zombies. Here's an example:

import subprocess

def spawn_some_children():
    children = []
    children.append(subprocess.Popen(["sleep", "3"]))
    children.append(subprocess.Popen(["sleep", "3"]))
    children.append(subprocess.Popen(["sleep", "3"]))
    return children

def do_some_stuff():
    children = spawn_some_children()
    # do some stuff
    print "children went out to play, now I can do my job..."
    # do more stuff

    # if children finish while we are in this function,
    # they will become zombies - because we keep a reference to them

In the above example, if you want to get rid of the zombies, you can either .wait() on each of the children or .poll() until the result is not None .

Either way is fine - either not keeping references, or using .wait() or .poll() .

Answer 5

The python runtime takes responsibility for getting rid of zombie process once their process objects have been garbage collected. If you see the zombie lying around it means you have kept a process object and not called wait, poll or terminate on it.

Answer 6

I'm not sure what you mean "I need to run my script with no_wait()", but I think this example does what you need. Processes will not be zombies for very long. The parent process will only wait() on them when they are actually already terminated and thus they will quickly unzombify.

#!/usr/bin/env python2.6
import subprocess
import sys
import time

children = []
#Step 1: Launch all the children asynchronously
for i in range(10):
    #For testing, launch a subshell that will sleep various times
    popen = subprocess.Popen(["/bin/sh", "-c", "sleep %s" % (i + 8)])
    children.append(popen)
    print "launched subprocess PID %s" % popen.pid

#reverse the list just to prove we wait on children in the order they finish,
#not necessarily the order they start
children.reverse()
#Step 2: loop until all children are terminated
while children:
    #Step 3: poll all active children in order
    children[:] = [child for child in children if child.poll() is None]
    print "Still running: %s" % [popen.pid for popen in children]
    time.sleep(1)

print "All children terminated"

The output towards the end looks like this:

Still running: [29776, 29774, 29772]
Still running: [29776, 29774]
Still running: [29776]
Still running: []
All children terminated

Answer 7

Like this:
s = Popen(args)
s.terminate()
time.sleep(0.5)
s.poll()

it works
zombie processes will disappear

Answer 8

I'm not entirely sure what you mean by no_wait() . Do you mean you can't block waiting for child processes to finish? Assuming so, I think this will do what you want:

os.wait3(os.WNOHANG)

Answer 9

Recently, I came across this zombie problem due to my python script. The actual problem was mainly due to killing of the subprocess and the parent process doesn't know that the child is dead. So what I did was, just adding popen.communicate() after the kill signal of child process so that the parent process comes to know that the child is dead, then the kernel updates the pid of the childprocess since the child is no more and so there is no zombies formed now.

PS:poll is also an option here since it checks and conveys about the child status to the parent. Often in subprocess it is better if u use check_output or call if u need not communicate with the stdout and stdin.

Answer 10

When you don't need to wait for any subprocesses you spawned, the simplest solution to prevent zombie processes is to call signal(SIGCHLD, SIG_IGN); during initialization. Then, terminated subprocesses are deleted immediately . This setting applies to the whole process, so you can only use it if there isn't any child you need to wait for.

In Python:

import signal
signal.signal(signal.SIGCHLD, signal.SIG_IGN)
# …
# call subprocess.Popen(…) as needed