[英]How to convert Bitmap to byte[,,] faster?
I wrote function: 我写了函数:
public static byte[, ,] Bitmap2Byte(Bitmap image)
{
int h = image.Height;
int w = image.Width;
byte[, ,] result= new byte[w, h, 3];
for (int i = 0; i < w; i++)
{
for (int j = 0; j < h; j++)
{
Color c= image.GetPixel(i, j);
result[i, j, 0] = c.R;
result[i, j, 1] = c.G;
result[i, j, 2] = c.B;
}
}
return result;
}
But it takes almost 6 seconds to convert 1800x1800 image. 但转换1800x1800图像需要将近6秒钟。 Can I do this faster?
我能更快地做到吗?
EDIT: 编辑:
OK, I found this: http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/system.drawing.imaging.bitmapdata.aspx 好的,我发现了这个: http : //msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/system.drawing.imaging.bitmapdata.aspx
There is nice example. 有很好的例子。 Only question I have is about
Marshal.Copy
. 我唯一的问题是关于
Marshal.Copy
。 Can I make it copy data directly into byte[,,]
? 我可以将数据直接复制到
byte[,,]
吗?
EDIT 2: OK, sometimes I got strange values of pixels and they do not seem to follow r0 g0 b0 r1 g1 b1 rule. 编辑2:
好的,有时我得到奇怪的像素值,它们似乎没有遵循r0 g0 b0 r1 g1 b1规则。 Why? 为什么? Never mind. 没关系。 Figured it out.
弄清楚了。
EDIT 3: Made it. 编辑3:做到了。 0,13s vs 5,35s :)
0,13s vs 5,35s :)
You can speed this up considerably by using a BitmapData
object which is returned from Bitmap.LockBits
. 通过使用从
Bitmap.LockBits
返回的BitmapData
对象,可以大大提高速度。 Google "C# Bitmap LockBits" for a bunch of examples. Google“C#Bitmap LockBits”提供了大量示例。
GetPixel
is painfully, painfully slow, making it (ironically) completely unsuitable for the manipulation of individual pixels. GetPixel
令人痛苦,痛苦地缓慢,使它(具有讽刺意味)完全不适合操纵单个像素。
I've been wondering this for a while. 我一直在想这个问题。
In .NET 4.0 Microsoft introduced the Parallel library. 在.NET 4.0中,Microsoft引入了并行库。 Basically what this does is there is a Parallel.For method that will automatically spawn off numerous threads to help with the work.
基本上它的作用是有一个Parallel.For方法,它会自动产生许多线程来帮助完成工作。 For instance if you originally had a For(int i =0;i<3;i++){ code...}, A parallel.For loop would probably create 3 threads and each thread would have a different value for i running through the inner code.
例如,如果你最初有一个For(int i = 0; i <3; i ++){code ...},一个parallel.For循环可能会创建3个线程,每个线程将有一个不同的值,我穿过内码。 So the best thing i can suggest is a Parallel.For loop with a
所以我能建议的最好的东西是一个带有一个的Parallel.For循环
Color c
lock(obraz)
{
c = obraz.GetPixel(..)
}
...
when getting the pixel. 获得像素时
If you need any more explanation on parallelism I can't really assist you before you take some time to study it as it is a huge area of study. 如果你需要更多关于并行性的解释,在你花一些时间研究它之前我无法真正帮助你,因为它是一个巨大的研究领域。
I just tried parallel For
. 我刚试过并行
For
。
It doesn't work without SyncLock
on the bitmap. 如果没有位图上的
SyncLock
,它就无法工作。
It says the object is in use. 它说对象正在使用中。
So it pretty much just works, in serial lol... what a mess. 所以它几乎只是工作,连续大声笑......真是一团糟。
For xx As Integer = 0 To 319
pq.ForAll(Sub(yy)
Dim Depth = getDepthValue(Image, xx, yy) / 2047
Dim NewColor = Depth * 128
Dim Pixel = Color.FromArgb(NewColor, NewColor, NewColor)
SyncLock Bmp2
Bmp2.SetPixel(xx, yy, Pixel)
End SyncLock
End Sub)
Next
In case you're wondering, this is converting kinect's depth map -> bitmap
. 如果你想知道,这是转换kinect的
depth map -> bitmap
。
Kinect's depth range is from 11bit(0-2047) and represents distance not color. Kinect的深度范围是11位(0-2047),表示距离而不是颜色。
声明:本站的技术帖子网页,遵循CC BY-SA 4.0协议,如果您需要转载,请注明本站网址或者原文地址。任何问题请咨询:yoyou2525@163.com.