[英]Best for 3D network visualization: panda3d or Crystal Space 3D?
I am interested in creating a 3D visualization of network packets.我有兴趣创建网络数据包的 3D 可视化。 A few years ago these things sold for tens of thousands of dollars, but now I think that I can hack one together in a few hours using an open source 3D kit.
几年前,这些东西的售价为数万美元,但现在我认为我可以使用开源 3D 套件在几个小时内将它们组合在一起。
I've looked around and have found two kids that look good --- one is Panda3D and the other is CrystalSpace.我环顾四周,发现了两个看起来不错的孩子——一个是Panda3D,另一个是CrystalSpace。
My requirements are:我的要求是:
This visualization doesn't need to run in a browser.此可视化不需要在浏览器中运行。
So I'm looking for advice.所以我在寻求建议。 My questions:
我的问题:
Thanks.谢谢。
If you want to get something going in only a few hours I think your only viable option is Visual Python .如果你想在几个小时内完成一些事情,我认为你唯一可行的选择是Visual Python 。 It is much faster than Panda3d/Python for large quantities of primitives and has a much easier API.
对于大量原语,它比 Panda3d/Python 快得多,并且具有更容易的 API。 It does not have an option to work from C++ but since it is a very thin wrapper of a C++ back end I don't think you would be able to add too much performance dropping the Python.
它没有从 C++ 工作的选项,但由于它是 C++ 后端的一个非常薄的包装器,我认为你不能增加太多的性能而放弃 ZA7F5F35426B9273821736 I can compute and display 8000 lit/shaded rotating boxes at 15fps on my system.
我可以在我的系统上以 15fps 的速度计算和显示 8000 个光照/阴影旋转框。
声明:本站的技术帖子网页,遵循CC BY-SA 4.0协议,如果您需要转载,请注明本站网址或者原文地址。任何问题请咨询:yoyou2525@163.com.