Java：如何从List <T>转换为Map <f1（T），List（f2（T））>而无需迭代

Question

I have a list of objects that I need to transform to a map where the keys are a function of each element, and the values are lists of another function of each element. Effectively this is grouping the elements by a function of them.

For example, suppose a simple element class:

class Element {
    int f1() { ... }
    String f2() { ... }
}

and a list of these:

[
    { f1=100, f2="Alice" },
    { f1=200, f2="Bob" },
    { f1=100, f2="Charles" },
    { f1=300, f2="Dave" }
]

then I would like a map as follows:

{
    {key=100, value=[ "Alice", "Charles" ]},
    {key=200, value=[ "Bob" ]},
    {key=300, value=[ "Dave" ]}
}

Can anyone suggest a succinct way of doing this in Java without iterating ? A combination of LambdaJ's group method with Guava's Maps.transform nearly gets there, but group doesn't generate a map.

Answer 1

Guava has Maps.uniqueIndex(Iterable values, Function keyFunction) and Multimaps.index(Iterable values, Function keyFunction) , but they don't transform the values. There are some requests to add utility methods that do what you want, but for now, you'll have to roll it yourself using Multimaps.index() and Multimaps.transformValues():

static class Person {
    private final Integer age;
    private final String name;

    public Person(Integer age, String name) {
        this.age = age;
        this.name = name;
    }

    public Integer getAge() {
        return age;
    }

    public String getName() {
        return name;
    }
}

private enum GetAgeFunction implements Function<Person, Integer> {
    INSTANCE;

    @Override
    public Integer apply(Person person) {
        return person.getAge();
    }
}

private enum GetNameFunction implements Function<Person, String> {
    INSTANCE;

    @Override
    public String apply(Person person) {
        return person.getName();
    }
}

public void example() {
    List<Person> persons = ImmutableList.of(
            new Person(100, "Alice"),
            new Person(200, "Bob"),
            new Person(100, "Charles"),
            new Person(300, "Dave")
    );

    ListMultimap<Integer, String> ageToNames = getAgeToNamesMultimap(persons);

    System.out.println(ageToNames);

    // prints {100=[Alice, Charles], 200=[Bob], 300=[Dave]}
}

private ListMultimap<Integer, String> getAgeToNamesMultimap(List<Person> persons) {
    ImmutableListMultimap<Integer, Person> ageToPersons = Multimaps.index(persons, GetAgeFunction.INSTANCE);
    ListMultimap<Integer, String> ageToNames = Multimaps.transformValues(ageToPersons, GetNameFunction.INSTANCE);

    // Multimaps.transformValues() returns a *lazily* transformed view of "ageToPersons"
    // If we want to iterate multiple times over it, it's better to create a copy
    return ImmutableListMultimap.copyOf(ageToNames);
}

---

A re-usable utility method could be:

public static <E, K, V> ImmutableListMultimap<K, V> keyToValuesMultimap(Iterable<E> elements, Function<E, K> keyFunction, Function<E, V> valueFunction) {
    ImmutableListMultimap<K, E> keysToElements = Multimaps.index(elements, keyFunction);
    ListMultimap<K, V> keysToValuesLazy = Multimaps.transformValues(keysToElements, valueFunction);
    return ImmutableListMultimap.copyOf(keysToValuesLazy);
}

I guess we could improve the generics in the signature by using Function<? extends E, K> Function<? extends E, K> or something, but I don't have the time to delve further...

Answer 2

Now with Java8 you can do it like:

static class Element {
    final int f1;
    final String f2;

    Element(int f1, String f2) {
        this.f1 = f1;
        this.f2 = f2;
    }

    int f1() { return f1;}
    String f2() { return f2; }
}

public static void main(String[] args) {
    List<Element> elements = new ArrayList<>();
    elements.add(new Element(100, "Alice"));
    elements.add(new Element(200, "Bob"));
    elements.add(new Element(100, "Charles"));
    elements.add(new Element(300, "Dave"));

    elements.stream()
            .collect(Collectors.groupingBy(
                    Element::f1,
                    Collectors.mapping(Element::f2, Collectors.toList())
                    ))
            .forEach((f1, f2) -> System.out.println("{"+f1.toString() + ", value="+f2+"}"));
}

Answer 3

There has been some discussion in adding one API in Apache's CollectionUtils to transform a List to Map, but then I dont see any reason for not using a foreach contruct, Is there any problem that you are facing ? Transform will do the same thing which you can get easily by foreach, looping cannot be avoided.

EDIT:

Here is the link to discussion in Apache's forum http://apache-commons.680414.n4.nabble.com/Convert-List-to-Map-td747218.html

Answer 4

I don't know why you don't want to iterate. JDK does not support transform, but you can implement it yourself.

If you are worried about the performance, even if JDK had supported it, it would have also iterated it.