简体   繁体   English

什么时候应该使用HTML5微数据进行搜索引擎优化?

[英]When should I use HTML5 Microdata for SEO?

So I've been looking into this HTML 5 Microdata, but I'm not sure if or when it is appropriate to use. 所以我一直在研究这个HTML 5微数据,但我不确定它是否适合使用。 I know that if used with rating and you search a website it will pull up things like video rating and article ratings etc. But for Microdata like People or Places, is that so useful that I should start implementing it into all my websites - big and small? 我知道,如果用于评级,你搜索一个网站,它会提取视频评级和文章评级等内容。但对于像人物或地方这样的微数据,这是非常有用的,我应该开始在我的所有网站中实现它 - 大和小? How big of an impact will this really have on my SEO if I start using Microdata on everything? 如果我开始在所有东西上使用Microdata,这对我的搜索引擎优化有多大影响?

Maybe using something like http://schema.org/ as my standard term dictionary. 也许使用像http://schema.org/这样的标准术语词典。 I think that is what Google suggests using. 我认为这是谷歌建议使用的。 Here's a link to the dev of microdata http://dev.w3.org/html5/md/ which will be helpful if you are unfamiliar with microdata 这里是微数据开发的链接http://dev.w3.org/html5/md/ ,如果您不熟悉微数据,将会有所帮助

Following to that Schema.org - Why You're Behind if You're Not Using It... article on SEOMoz, I must say this question is not just about microdata and Google SERPs positions. Schema.org之后 - 如果你没有使用它,为什么你会落后......关于SEOMoz的文章,我必须说这个问题不仅仅是微观数据和谷歌SERP的立场。 I think it has to be taken in a much wider meaning: 我认为必须采取更广泛的含义:

Some advantages: 一些优点:

  • Implementing microdata on a website DOES increase CHANCE for Rich Snippets displayed next to your site on Google search results. 在网站上实施微数据会增加在Google搜索结果中显示在您网站旁边的Rich Snippets的CHANCE。 You can't say 'microdata = rich snippets', but you also can't say 'no microdata = no rich snippets' :) 你不能说'microdata = rich snippets',但你也不能说'没有微数据=没有丰富的片段':)
  • Having rich snippets increases users' attention to that single search result and it CAN result in more clicks => visitors on your page. 拥有丰富网页摘要会增加用户对该搜索结果的关注度,并且会导致您的网页上有更多点击次数=>访问者。

Some cons: 一些缺点:

  • Some rich snippets, which can be a result of using microdata, can let users find information they're looking for directly on the search results, without actually reaching your page. 一些丰富的片段(可能是使用微数据的结果)可以让用户直接在搜索结果中查找他们正在寻找的信息,而无需实际访问您的页面。 eg. 例如。 if user is looking for a phone number and see it on rich snippet, he doesn't have to click and visit your page. 如果用户正在查找电话号码并在丰富的代码段中查看,则他无需点击并访问您的页面。

You have to decide on your own if you can take that risk. 如果你能冒这个风险,你必须自己决定。 From my own experience (and that article comments as well), that risk is quite small and if you can, you should implement microdata. 根据我自己的经验(以及那篇文章的评论),这种风险非常小,如果可以的话,你应该实现微观数据。 Of course, 'if you can' should really mean: 'if you can and it won't need the whole site to be rebuilt' :) If you have more serious things to do on your site, you should put them in front of a queue. 当然,'如果你能'应该真的意味着:'如果可以,它将不需要重建整个网站':)如果你的网站上有更严肃的事情要做,你应该把它们放在一个队列。 Today, it's only 'nice-to-have', not 'must-have'. 今天,它只是'很高兴',而不是'必须'。

And just for the end - I know my answer is not just yes or not the answer, but it's because the question is not that kind of question. 只是为了结束 - 我知道我的答案不仅仅是答案,而是答案,但这是因为问题不是那样的问题。 However, I hope it could help you make your own decision. 但是,我希望它可以帮助您做出自己的决定。

My answer would be "Always." 我的回答是“永远”。

It's the emerging standard for categorizing all forms of information on the web. 它是在网络上对所有形式的信息进行分类的新兴标准。

Raven Tools (no affiliation) has a schema.org microdata generator that's a good place to start: Raven Tools(没有隶属关系)有一个schema.org微数据生成器,这是一个很好的起点:

http://schema-creator.org/product.php http://schema-creator.org/product.php

They have a couple stock schema templates on that page (look on the left column). 他们在该页面上有几个库存模式模板(在左栏中查看)。

声明:本站的技术帖子网页,遵循CC BY-SA 4.0协议,如果您需要转载,请注明本站网址或者原文地址。任何问题请咨询:yoyou2525@163.com.

 
粤ICP备18138465号  © 2020-2024 STACKOOM.COM