简体繁体 English

B测试选项？

[英]A/B Testing Options for UI / UX Metrics vs Goals?

原文 2012-02-27 23:58:03 2 1 ruby-on-rails/ ruby/ ruby-on-rails-3/ user-interface/ user-experience

I'm needing an A/B testing solution that is not "conversion" or goal oriented. 我需要一个不是“转换”或面向目标的A / B测试解决方案。 What options exist for Rails? Rails有哪些选项？ It needs to be a mechanism that interleaves routes to various pages defined for a "group" (such as I want to interleave between these 3 views for this particular page round robin). 它需要是一种将路由交错到为“组”定义的各个页面的机制（例如，我想针对此特定页面循环在这3个视图之间进行交错）。

My primary goal is to interleave pages (routes) as users visit them. 我的主要目标是在用户访问页面时插入页面（路由）。 So, for example, when a user hits "/" it would load up the default page one time and then another route such as "/front-page-2" on the next load of "/". 因此，例如，当用户单击“ /”时，它将一次加载默认页面，然后在下一次加载“ /”时加载另一条路由，例如“ / front-page-2”。 Or any other page for that matter. 或任何其他页面。 I need to thoroughly test between a number of variations and allow the system to switch these around so that all pages being tested get a round robin opportunity. 我需要在多个变体之间进行全面测试，并允许系统进行切换，以便所有要测试的页面都具有循环机会。

The main goal here is to get some UI / UX testing in place with MouseFlow.com. 这里的主要目标是使用MouseFlow.com进行一些UI / UX测试。 I am able to record user heatmaps, click counts, hover results, etc. however I must be able to give all of the pages a fair chance in order to make judgement calls based on the metrics I get back from MouseFlow. 我能够记录用户热图，点击次数，悬停结果等。但是，我必须能够给所有页面一个公平的机会，以便根据我从MouseFlow获得的指标进行判断。

1 个解决方案

I ended up going with VisualWebOptimizer.com if anyone's interested. 如果有人感兴趣，我最终选择了VisualWebOptimizer.com。 I found it is working exactly as I needed it and allows me to work with MouseFlow.com as well to accomplish our goals. 我发现它完全可以按需运行，并允许我与MouseFlow.com一起完成目标。