简体   繁体   English

如何证明所有两个参数函数的集合都是不可数的

[英]How to prove set of all two argument functions cannot be countable

We can prove that set of all one argument functions cannot be countable using the cantor's diagonal. 我们可以证明使用cantor的对角线无法计算所有一个参数函数的集合。 for example 例如

     1    2    3    4    5    6    7 ......

f1   10   12   23   1    3    12   3 ......    
f2   15    6    7   8    9    11   4 ...... 
f3   14    2    4   3    3     4   5 ...... 
f4   12    2    3   5    1    20   56 .....   
.
.
.

for all functions f1 to fn we can pass all the arguments and 1 to n for some n. 对于所有函数f1到fn,我们可以将所有参数传递给1到n,并传递给n。 then by taking the diagonal values and add 1 to diagonal values and we can prove that we can't count all the one argument functions.(since change the diagonal values will produce a row unique which haven't listed) 然后通过取对角线值并将1加到对角线值上,我们可以证明我们不能计算所有一个参数函数(因为更改对角线值将产生未列出的唯一行)

Wonder is there a particular method to count two argument functions also??.. 想知道有没有一种特殊的方法来计算两个参数函数呢?

Thanks.. 谢谢..

Wonder is there a particular method to count two argument functions also??.. 想知道有没有一种特殊的方法来计算两个参数函数呢?

You mean Wonder is there a particular method to count two argument functions? 您的意思Wonder有一种计算两个参数函数的特定方法吗? ("also" would imply that one exists for one-argument functions). (“也”表示一个参数函数存在一个)。

If a subset of a non-countable set is always also noncountable then you could just use the subset of the set of all two-argument functions where you fix the second parameter to a constant (making it essentially equal to a one-argument-function). 如果不可数集合的子集始终也是不可数的,那么您可以使用所有两个参数函数的集合的子集,将第二个参数固定为常量(使其基本上等于一个参数函数) )。 However I doubt that this assumption is true. 但是我怀疑这个假设是正确的。

I think you left out some important prerequisites about the diagram (how the fn are constructed as they are not chosen arbitrarily). 我认为您省略了有关该图的一些重要先决条件(fn的构造方式,因为它们不是任意选择的)。 Maybe examining them will lead you to the clue? 也许检查它们会带您找到线索? I guess this is a homework question? 我想这是一个作业问题? Is it allowed on stackoverflow to post homework questions and in your university to have them let solved by someone else? 是否可以在stackoverflow上发布家庭作业问题,并在您的大学中让其他人解决这些问题?

I think I've found an answer. 我想我已经找到了答案。 I'm writing the answer in case anyone is interested. 如果有人有兴趣,我正在写答案。

we can prove than all the pairs of positive integers can be countable. 我们可以证明所有正整数对都是可数的。 see below 见下文

(1,1) (1,2) (1,3) (1,4) (1,5) (1,6).....
(2,1) (2,2) (2,3) (2,4) (2,5) (2,6).....
(3,1) (3,2) (3,3) (3,4) (3,5) (3,6).....
(4,1) (4,2) (4,3) (4,4) (4,5) (4,6).....
 .
 .
 .

so from the cantor's zig zag we can prove that they can be countable.. see page 8 on this book http://www.scribd.com/doc/51068193/3/Enumerable-Sets 因此,从cantor的之字形可以证明它们是可数的。.参见本书第8页http://www.scribd.com/doc/51068193/3/Enumerable-Sets

(1,1) (1,2) (2,1) (1,3) (2,2) (3,1) ....

so we can write our problem as below. 因此我们可以如下编写问题。

    (1,1)   (1,2)   (2,1)   (1,3)   (2,2)   (3,1)

f1   10      12       23       1      3       12    ......    
f2   15       6        7       8      9       11    ...... 
f3   14       2        4       3      3        4    ...... 
f4   12       2        3       5      1       20    ......   
.
.
.

Now by the knowledge of cantor's diagonal.. we can argue that all the two argument functions can't be countable. 现在,通过对康托尔的对角线的了解,我们可以证明两个参数函数都是不可数的。

声明:本站的技术帖子网页,遵循CC BY-SA 4.0协议,如果您需要转载,请注明本站网址或者原文地址。任何问题请咨询:yoyou2525@163.com.

 
粤ICP备18138465号  © 2020-2024 STACKOOM.COM