我用这个简单的方法调用转发类重新发明了轮子吗？

Question

I just found myself creating a class

template <typename T> struct invoker {
  void operator()(T& it) const {it();}
};

so I could pass an invoker<foo> to something (which isn't under my control) which wants to call invoker<foo>::operator()(foo&) on it repeatedly with different foo instances, to get it to forward those calls to the foo 's foo::operator()() method.

I know it's only a few lines, but this seems like the sort of thing which is probably already provided for by STL's functional, or boost::bind somehow. Except I can't see the trick, if there is one. (I'm sure I'm not the first person to use something very like this; does it have a name ?)

Answer 1

Well, you can use std::bind , probably boost::bind as well to achieve the same behaviour:

#include <string>
#include <iostream>
#include <functional>

struct foo {
    void operator()() {
        std::cout << "Hallo, im at addr: " << std::hex << this << std::endl;
    }
};

int main() {
    std::function<void(foo*)> fun = std::bind(&foo::operator(), std::placeholders::_1);
    foo f1, f2;
    fun(&f1);
    fun(&f2);
}

Outputs:

Hallo, im at addr: 0xbffc396a
Hallo, im at addr: 0xbffc3969

If you use a template class for the argument type, you can have the same behvaiour without reinventing the wheel.

Edit : as Crazy Eddie pointed out, you can just use boost::mem_fn or std::mem_fn :

std::function<void(foo*)> fun = std::mem_fn(&foo::operator());

Instead of bind .

Answer 2

Yeah, you're reinventing the wheel. std::mem_fun_ref does what you want.

std::vector<foo> foos;

...

std::for_each(foos.begin(), foos.end(), std::mem_fun_ref(&foo::operator()));

Alternatively:

std::vector<foo*> foos;

...

std::for_each(foos.begin(), foos.end(), std::mem_fun(&foo::operator()));

Not having to mess with whether your param is ptr or not is one great benefit of boost::mem_fn.

Anything much more complex than that though and you begin running into trouble with the C++03 binders and need something more expressive like boost.bind.