QtQuick或QGraphicsView
[英]QtQuick or QGraphicsView
问题描述
When I should use QGraphicsView and When QtQuick is a better choice? 
什么时候应该使用QGraphicsView和什么时候QtQuick是更好的选择？
Which is better choice if I want high performance application with highly customized widgets (visual of widgets and its behaviors)? 如果我想要带有高度自定义的小部件（小部件及其行为的外观）的高性能应用程序，哪个是更好的选择？
:? ：？
1 个解决方案
解决方案1
1 已采纳 2012-08-23 03:08:00
For high performances, you should use Qt and C++ instead of QML and JavaScript. 为了获得高性能，您应该使用Qt和C ++而不是QML和JavaScript。 So let's use a QGraphicsView in this case. 因此，在这种情况下，让我们使用QGraphicsView 。
However, creating a widget is much more easier and faster with QML than QtWidget. 但是，使用QML创建小部件比使用QtWidget更加容易和快捷。 It may be great for making prototypes or for interfaces which are made by designers. 这对于制作原型或设计师设计的界面可能非常有用。 QML is a convinient solution if you do not need high performances. 如果您不需要高性能，则QML是一种便捷的解决方案。 You can also have a look at this article to improve the QML performances in your program 您也可以查看本文以改善程序中的QML性能
声明:本站的技术帖子网页，遵循CC BY-SA 4.0协议，如果您需要转载，请注明本站网址或者原文地址。任何问题请咨询:yoyou2525@163.com.