[英]ActiveMQ performance in different Operating Systems
I have tested activeMQ JMSProducer in some operating systems. 我已经在某些操作系统中测试了activeMQ JMSProducer。 The results are as follows: 结果如下:
AIX - Persistent - around 50 messages per second
Solaris - Persistent - around 60 messages per second
Linux - Persistent - around 500 messages per second
Is that normal behaviour because in Linux, it is much much faster? 这是正常现象,因为在Linux中,速度要快得多吗? ActiveMQ Performance
document is only based on Linux. ActiveMQ Performance
文档仅基于Linux。
And, does Slow KahaDB access
slow down activeMQ performance? 而且, Slow KahaDB access
降低activeMQ性能?
Thanks. 谢谢。
With persisted connections you are highly dependant on the performance of your hardware and how the OS will commit write to disk. 使用持久连接,您将高度依赖硬件的性能以及操作系统如何将写入磁盘提交。 If you enable the write cache on your disk for example, this could be enough to explain the difference. 例如,如果您在磁盘上启用了写缓存,这足以说明它们之间的区别。 If you used an SSD, I would expect performance to be at least 10x higher, regardless of the OS. 如果使用SSD,则无论使用哪种操作系统,我都希望性能至少提高10倍。
声明:本站的技术帖子网页,遵循CC BY-SA 4.0协议,如果您需要转载,请注明本站网址或者原文地址。任何问题请咨询:yoyou2525@163.com.