简体   繁体   English

我可以/通常使用std :: forward而不是std :: move吗?

[英]Can I typically/always use std::forward instead of std::move?

I've been watching Scott Meyers' talk on Universal References from the C++ and Beyond 2012 conference, and everything makes sense so far. 我一直在观看Scott Meyers 关于 C ++和2012 年之后的Universal References演讲,到目前为止一切都很有意义。 However, an audience member asks a question at around 50 minutes in that I was also wondering about. 然而,一位观众在大约50分钟后问了一个问题,我也在想。 Meyers says that he does not care about the answer because it is non-idiomatic and would silly his mind, but I'm still interested. 迈尔斯说,他不关心答案,因为它不是惯用的,会愚蠢的想法,但我仍然感兴趣。

The code presented is as follows: 提供的代码如下:

// Typical function bodies with overloading:
void doWork(const Widget& param)   // copy
{
  // ops and exprs using param
}
void doWork(Widget&& param)        // move
{
  // ops and exprs using std::move(param)
}

// Typical function implementations with universal reference:
template <typename T>
void doWork(T&& param)             // forward => copy and move
{
  // ops and exprs using std::forward<T>(param)
}

The point being that when we take an rvalue reference, we know we have an rvalue, so we should std::move it to preserve the fact that it's an rvalue. 关键是当我们采用右值引用时,我们知道我们有一个rvalue,所以我们应该std::move它来保留它是一个rvalue的事实。 When we take a universal reference ( T&& , where T is a deduced type), we want std::forward to preserve the fact that it may have been an lvalue or an rvalue. 当我们采用通用引用( T&& ,其中T是推导类型)时,我们希望std::forward保留它可能是左值或右值的事实。

So the question is: since std::forward preserves whether the value passed into the function was either an lvalue or an rvalue, and std::move simply casts its argument to an rvalue, could we just use std::forward everywhere? 所以问题是:因为std::forward保留传递给函数的值是左值还是右值,而std::move只是将其参数转换为右值,我们可以只使用std::forward吗? Would std::forward behave like std::move in all cases where we would use std::move , or are there some important differences in behaviour that are missed out by Meyers' generalisation? 在我们使用std::move所有情况下, std::forward行为都会像std::move一样,还是在Meyers的泛化中错过了一些重要的行为差异?

I'm not suggesting that anybody should do it because, as Meyers correctly says, it's completely non-idiomatic, but is the following also a valid use of std::move : 我并不是说任何人都应该这样做,因为正如迈耶斯所说,这完全是非惯用的,但以下也是std::move的有效用法:

void doWork(Widget&& param)         // move
{
  // ops and exprs using std::forward<Widget>(param)
}

The two are very different and complementary tools. 这两者是非常不同和互补的工具。

  • std::move deduces the argument and unconditionally creates an rvalue expression. std::move 推导出参数并无条件地创建一个rvalue表达式。 This makes sense to apply to an actual object or variable. 这适用于实际对象或变量。

  • std::forward takes a mandatory template argument (you must specify this!) and magically creates an lvalue or an rvalue expression depending on what the type was (by virtue of adding && and the collapsing rules). std::forward采用强制模板参数(你必须指定它!)并根据类型(通过添加&&和折叠规则)神奇地创建一个左值或右值表达式。 This only makes sense to apply to a deduced, templated function argument. 这仅适用于推导的,模板化的函数参数。

Maybe the following examples illustrate this a bit better: 也许以下示例说明了这一点:

#include <utility>
#include <memory>
#include <vector>
#include "foo.hpp"

std::vector<std::unique_ptr<Foo>> v;

template <typename T, typename ...Args>
std::unique_ptr<T> make_unique(Args &&... args)
{
    return std::unique_ptr<T>(new T(std::forward<Args>(args)...));  // #1
}

int main()
{
    {
        std::unique_ptr<Foo> p(new Foo('a', true, Bar(1,2,3)));
        v.push_back(std::move(p));                                  // #2
    }

    {
        v.push_back(make_unique<Foo>('b', false, Bar(5,6,7)));      // #3
    }

    {
        Bar b(4,5,6);
        char c = 'x';
        v.push_back(make_unique<Foo>(c, b.ready(), b));             // #4
    }
}

In situation #2, we have an existing, concrete object p , and we want to move from it, unconditionally. 在情况#2中,我们有一个现有的具体对象p ,我们想要无条件地从它移动。 Only std::move makes sense. 只有std::move才有意义。 There's nothing to "forward" here. 这里没有什么可以“前进”的。 We have a named variable and we want to move from it. 我们有一个命名变量,我们希望从中移动。

On the other hand, situation #1 accepts a list of any sort of arguments, and each argument needs to be forwarded as the same value category as it was in the original call. 另一方面,情境#1接受任何类型的参数列表,并且每个参数需要作为与原始调用中相同的值类别转发。 For example, in #3 the arguments are temporary expressions, and thus they will be forwarded as rvalues. 例如,在#3中,参数是临时表达式,因此它们将作为rvalues转发。 But we could also have mixed in named objects in the constructor call, as in situation #4, and then we need forwarding as lvalues. 但是我们也可以在构造函数调用中混合使用命名对象,如情况#4,然后我们需要转发为左值。

Yes, if param is a Widget&& , then the following three expressions are equivalent (assuming that Widget is not a reference type): 是的,如果param是一个Widget&& ,那么以下三个表达式是等价的(假设Widget不是引用类型):

std::move(param)
std::forward<Widget>(param)
static_cast<Widget&&>(param)

In general (when Widget may be a reference), std::move(param) is equivalent to both of the following expressions: 通常(当Widget可能是引用时), std::move(param)等效于以下两个表达式:

std::forward<std::remove_reference<Widget>::type>(param)
static_cast<std::remove_reference<Widget>::type&&>(param)

Note how much nicer std::move is for moving stuff. 注意std::move对于移动东西有多好。 The point of std::forward is that it mixes well with template type deduction rules: std::forward是它与模板类型扣除规则很好地混合:

template<typename T>
void foo(T&& t) {
    std::forward<T>(t);
    std::move(t);
}

int main() {
    int a{};
    int const b{};
               //Deduced T   Signature    Result of `forward<T>` Result of `move`
    foo(a);    //int&        foo(int&)       lvalue int          xvalue int
    foo(b);    //int const&  foo(int const&) lvalue int const    xvalue int const
    foo(int{});//int         foo(int&&)      xvalue int          xvalue int
}

声明:本站的技术帖子网页,遵循CC BY-SA 4.0协议,如果您需要转载,请注明本站网址或者原文地址。任何问题请咨询:yoyou2525@163.com.

 
粤ICP备18138465号  © 2020-2024 STACKOOM.COM