Trajectory Clustering: Which Clustering Method?

Question

As a newbie in Machine Learning, I have a set of trajectories that may be of different lengths. I wish to cluster them, because some of them are actually the same path and they just SEEM different due to the noise.

In addition, not all of them are of the same lengths . So maybe although Trajectory A is not the same as Trajectory B, yet it is part of Trajectory B. I wish to present this property after the clustering as well.

I have only a bit knowledge of K-means Clustering and Fuzzy N-means Clustering . How may I choose between them two? Or should I adopt other methods?

Any method that takes the "belongness" into consideration? (eg After the clustering, I have 3 clusters A, B and C . One particular trajectory X belongs to cluster A . And a shorter trajectory Y , although is not clustered in A , is identified as part of trajectory B .)

=================== UPDATE ======================

The aforementioned trajectories are the pedestrians' trajectories. They can be either presented as a series of (x, y) points or a series of step vectors (length, direction) . The presentation form is under my control.

Answer 1

It might be a little late but I am also working on the same problem. I suggest you take a look at TRACLUS , an algorithm created by Jae-Gil Lee, Jiawei Han and Kyu-Young Wang, published on SIGMOD'07. http://web.engr.illinois.edu/~hanj/pdf/sigmod07_jglee.pdf

This is so far the best approach I have seen for clustering trajectories because:

• Can discover common sub-trajectories .
• Focuses on Segments instead of points (so it filters out noise-outliers ).
• It works over trajectories of different length .

Basically is a 2 phase approach:

1. Phase one - Partition: Divide trajectories into segments, this is done using MDL Optimization with complexity of O(n) where n is the numbers of points in a given trajectory. Here the input is a set of trajectories and output is a set of segments.

   • Complexity: O(n) where n is number of points on a trajectory
   • Input: Set of trajectories.
   • Output: Set D of segments

2. Phase two - Group: This phase discovers the clusters using some version of density-based clustering like in DBSCAN. Input in this phase is the set of segments obtained from phase one and some parameters of what constitutes a neighborhood and the minimum amount of lines that can constitute a cluster. Output is a set of clusters. Clustering is done over segments. They define their own distance measure made of 3 components: Parallel distance, perpendicular distance and angular distance. This phase has a complexity of O(n log n) where n is the number of segments.

   • Complexity: O(n log n) where n is number of segments on set D
   • Input: Set D of segments, parameter E that sets neighborhood treshold and parameter MinLns that is the minimun number of lines.
   • Output: Set C of Cluster, that is a Cluster of segments (trajectories clustered).

Finally they calculate a for each cluster a representative trajectory , which is nothing else that a discovered common sub-trajectory in each cluster .

They have pretty cool examples and the paper is very well explained. Once again this is not my algorithm, so don't forget to cite them if you are doing research.

PS: I made some slides based on their work, just for educational purposes: http://www.slideshare.net/ivansanchez1988/trajectory-clustering-traclus-algorithm

Answer 2

Every clustering algorithm needs a metric. You need to define distance between your samples. In your case simple Euclidean distance is not a good idea, especially if the trajectories can have different lengths.

If you define a metric, than you can use any clustering algorithm that allows for custom metric. Probably you do not know the correct number of clusters beforehand, then hierarchical clustering is a good option. K-means doesn't allow for custom metric, but there are modifications of K-means that do (like K-medoids)

The hard part is defining distance between two trajectories (time series). Common approach is DTW (Dynamic Time Warping). To improve performance you can approximate your trajectory by smaller amount of points (many algorithms for that).

Answer 3

Neither will work. Because what is a proper mean here?

Have a look at distance based clustering methods, such as hierarchical clustering (for small data sets, but you probably don't have thousands of trajectories) and DBSCAN.

Then you only need to choose an appropriate distance function that allows eg differences in time and spatial resolution of trajectories.

Distance functions such as dynamic time warping (DTW) distance can accomodate this.

Answer 4

This is good concept and having possibility for real-time applications. In my view, one can adopt any clustering but need to select appropriate dissimilarity measure, later need to think about computational complexity. Paper ( http://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-81-8489-203-1_15 ) used Hausdorff and suggest the technique for reducing complexity, and paper ( http://www.cit.iit.bas.bg/CIT_2015/v-15-2/4-5-TCMVS%20A-edited-md-Gotovop.pdf ) described the use of "Trajectory Clustering Technique Based on Multi-View Similarity"