The image code below works fine in Mozilla, Chrome and Safari but doesn't display in IE9.
It is saved as an image in photoshop for websites and I specified the height and width.
When I write it like this without the slash before "D:"
<img src="D:/obrazki/game.jpg" alt="game" width="1100" height="619" />
it works in IE but then it doesn't display in Mozilla.
<img src="/D:/obrazki/game.jpg" alt="game" width="1100" height="619" />
this code works fine in all browsers apart from IE
<img src="D:/obrazki/game.jpg" alt="game" width="1100" height="619" />
this one works fine in all apart from Mozilla
this is the whole div and there is not css style yet.
<section class="container">
<div class="image_carousel">
<div id="foo2">
<img src="/D:/obrazki/game.jpg" alt="game" width="1100" height="619" />
</div>
</article>
</section>
Do you think it is the extension problem and I should save the image as GIF not jpg. ?
and if I wanted to create separate code for IE would it work if I make comments like these below in my html file? and put the image code inside those comments for IE9?
<!--[if IE]>
<![endif]-->
Shouldn't the image call be:
<img src="/obrazki/game.jpg" alt="game" width="1100" height="619" />
?
Or better yet:
<img src="/obrazki/images/game.jpg" alt="game" width="1100" height="619" />
Where /obrazki would be where you have the pages/scripts to "call" your images..
如何链接到相对路径上的图像:
<img src="./link/to/image.jpg"/>
ok, lets do an old and dirty solution...serve up the images for non-ie(s), then serve up the images for ie(s) via conditional comments. (sidenote: there's a few ways to do this, like using a background-image on a wrapper element around the image, but since you are relying on img elements, i'll stick to that method. so
<section class="container">
<article>
<div class="image_carousel">
<div id="foo2">
<img src="/D:/obrazki/game.jpg" alt="game" width="1100" height="619" />
<!--[if lte IE 9]><img src="D:/obrazki/game.jpg" alt="game" width="1100" height="619" /><![endif]-->
</div>
</div>
</article>
</section>
that should work...in theory. you may have fouc or positioning issues, though i doubt the fouc...it's hard to tell without seeing it live, with the rest of the document.
The technical post webpages of this site follow the CC BY-SA 4.0 protocol. If you need to reprint, please indicate the site URL or the original address.Any question please contact:yoyou2525@163.com.