I have many css selectors and many selector exception, so I use :not to leave them out...
example (just some selectors I don't need):
[class*="-dashboard-"]:not([class$="-binding"]), [class*="-dashboard "]:not([class$="-binding"]), [class$="-dashboard"]:not([class$="-binding"])
But what I instead would prefer is:
([class*="-dashboard-"],[class*="-dashboard "],[class$="-dashboard"]):not([class*="-binding-"],[class*="-binding "],[class$="-binding"])
or something else, that ist shorter than the working one and easier to edit and not so repetitive...
My problem is that I have that selectors in big list. The user is allowed to add/remove lists so I have to dynamically change the selectors and exceptions.
Does anybody have an idea to short that one???
Usually, the way my CSS looks is with increasing specificity. A very generic rule sets a whole lot of defaults, and then something that positively matches one of those rules you gave us overrides that style with something else.
For instance, you could set a higher-priority rule for anything ending in "-binding" that makes elements invisible, or whatever you intend for them. In simple terms, to calculate a CSS rule's priority:
I think you'd do well by having more classes in your elements that are easily selected, ie anything that adds a lolwtf-dashboard
class should also add a dashboard
class that's easily CSS-selected.
The technical post webpages of this site follow the CC BY-SA 4.0 protocol. If you need to reprint, please indicate the site URL or the original address.Any question please contact:yoyou2525@163.com.