I have my routes set up as below. Its too frustrating that the view in view.tab
is loaded but its controller isn't called. I tried without the paramaters, but it still doesn't work as expected. Does anyone have any idea on how to solve this?
$stateProvider
.state('index', {
url: '/',
templateUrl: viewsRoot + 'restaurants/index.htm',
controller: 'RestaurantsCtrl'
})
.state('view', {
url: '/view',
controller: 'RestaurantsViewCtrl',
templateUrl: viewsRoot + '/restaurants/view.htm'
})
.state('view.tab', {
url: '/orders',
// controller: 'OrdersIndexCtrl',
controller: function ($scope) {
alert('This does not run');
},
views: {
"view": {
templateUrl: viewsRoot + '/restaurants/orders.htm'
}
}
});
$urlRouterProvider.otherwise("/");
You need to declare the controller along side the template:
views: {
"view": {
templateUrl: viewsRoot + '/restaurants/orders.htm',
controller: 'MyController' // (or a function, etc.)
}
The UI-Router wiki sort of alludes to this:
If you define a views object, your state's templateUrl, template and templateProvider will be ignored. So in the case that you need a parent layout of these views, you can define an abstract state that contains a template, and a child state under the layout state that contains the 'views' object.
Controllers are paired with a view. So if it ignores the "template" properties defined on the state, it seems to imply that it will ignore the controller too.
If you want all of your named views to share a controller, define an abstract parent state as the wiki suggests.
The technical post webpages of this site follow the CC BY-SA 4.0 protocol. If you need to reprint, please indicate the site URL or the original address.Any question please contact:yoyou2525@163.com.