REPORT zbc400_figure157.
TYPES: BEGIN OF t_conn,
cityfrom TYPE spfli-cityfrom,
cityto TYPE spfli-cityto,
carrid TYPE spfli-carrid,
connid TYPE spfli-connid,
END OF t_conn.
DATA:
conn_list LIKE STANDARD TABLE OF t_conn,
startline LIKE sy-tabix,
BEGIN OF wa_travel,
dest TYPE spfli-cityto,
cofl_list LIKE conn_list,
END OF wa_travel,
travel_list LIKE SORTED TABLE OF wa_travel WITH UNIQUE KEY dest.
FIELD-SYMBOLS:
<fs_conn> TYPE t_conn,
<fs_conn_int> TYPE t_conn,
<fs_travel> TYPE wa_travel.
PARAMETERS pa_start TYPE spfli-cityfrom DEFAULT 'FRANKFURT'.
SELECT carrid cityfrom cityto
FROM spfli
INTO CORRESPONDING FIELDS OF TABLE conn_list.
SORT conn_list BY cityfrom cityto ASCENDING AS TEXT.
** build up nested table.
LOOP AT conn_list ASSIGNING <fs_conn> WHERE cityfrom = pa_start.
CLEAR wa_travel.
wa_travel-dest = <fs_conn>-cityto.
READ TABLE conn_list
WITH KEY cityfrom = wa_travel-dest
TRANSPORTING NO FIELDS
BINARY SEARCH.
startline = sy-tabix.
LOOP AT conn_list ASSIGNING <fs_conn_int>
FROM startline.
IF <fs_conn_int>-cityfrom <> wa_travel-dest.
EXIT.
ENDIF.
APPEND <fs_conn_int> TO wa_travel-cofl_list.
ENDLOOP.
SORT wa_travel-cofl_list BY cityto carrid ASCENDING AS TEXT.
INSERT wa_travel INTO TABLE travel_list.
ENDLOOP.
Error: Field "T_CONN" is unknown. It is neither in one of the specified tables nor defined by a "DATA" statement . . . . . . . . . .
We declare an inner table COFL_LIST and an outer table TRAVEL_LIST with corrosponding work areas. An internal table CONN_LIST buffers all of the flight connections and sorts them.
The program uses 3 tables, inner table, outer table and an internal table.
I made the changes in the program as suggested by LPK:
conn_list TYPE STANDARD TABLE OF t_conn,
However, now the problem is in line:
FIELD-SYMBOLS:
<fs_conn> TYPE t_conn,
<fs_conn_int> TYPE t_conn,
<fs_travel> TYPE wa_travel.
Error: The type "WA_TRAVEL" is unknown. In the program wa_travel variable is already defined in it's BEGIN OF wa_travel and END OF wa_travel block. Why can't the system pick this up?
This line is wrong:
conn_list LIKE STANDARD TABLE OF t_conn,
T_CONN
is a type and therefore you have to use TYPE
instead of LIKE
.
You can find an explanation about the difference here .
The declaration is not correct...
FIELD-SYMBOLS: TYPE t_conn, TYPE t_conn, TYPE wa_travel.
Should be
FIELD-SYMBOLS: TYPE t_conn, TYPE t_conn, LIKE wa_travel.
You need to check with the link provided in the previous answer... or you can use the following from the Help Portal on TYPE & LIKE
The technical post webpages of this site follow the CC BY-SA 4.0 protocol. If you need to reprint, please indicate the site URL or the original address.Any question please contact:yoyou2525@163.com.