SWRL : ^ not work on protege 4.3

Question

I'm trying to add a SWRL rule to protege using conjuction sign ^ but Protege 4.3 does not approve that sign.

This issue is also present for swrl buildins such as swrlb:lessThanOrEqual .

What's wrong with ^ ? May I use , instead?

Answer 1

The terms in the Protege SWRL editor are separated by commas, not ^. See, for instance, the screenshots in my answer to SWRL rules in protege 3.4.8 .

whats wrong with ^ ? may i use , instead ?

That the answer, yes. I'm not sure what prevented you from trying it in your own running Protege, though.