I've just crossed this example, but it fails to resolve binding interface to implementation.
Having the follow code files:
// File: app/App/Services/Talkable.php
<?php
namespace App\Services;
interface Talkable {
public function talk();
}
// File: app/App/Services/Cat.php
<?php
namespace App\Services;
use App\Services\Talkable;
class Cat implements Talkable
{
public function talk()
{
return 'meow meow';
}
}
// File: app/Jobs/MakeSomeNoise.php
<?php
namespace App\Jobs;
use App\Jobs\Job;
use App\Services\Talkable;
class MakeSomeNoise extends Job
{
private $talkable;
public function __construct(Talkable $talkable)
{
$this->talkable = $talkable;
}
public function handle()
{
return ($this->talkable->talk());
}
}
The binding are taken place in app/Providers/AppServiceProvider.php
// File: app/Providers/AppServiceProvider.php
...
$this->app->bind('App\\Services\\Talkable', 'App\\Services\\Cat');
The MakeSomeNoise
job is dispatched from a Controller
// File: any controller
public function makeNoises()
{
return $this->dispatch(new MakeSomeNoise); // (*)
}
At the (*), I expect Laravel will automatically resolve the binding, but it doesn't. Here the error,
Argument 1 passed to App\Jobs\MakeSomeNoise::__construct() must be an instance of App\Services\Talkable, none given, called in ...
But if I just inject into controller constructor, it works fine.
Any thought on this?
My mistake in the code. The DI should be taken in handle()
method, not constructor.
public function handle(Talkable $talkable) {
// blah lbah
}
The technical post webpages of this site follow the CC BY-SA 4.0 protocol. If you need to reprint, please indicate the site URL or the original address.Any question please contact:yoyou2525@163.com.