I have a DataFrame with a lot of Signals and I want to convert it into a Map[String, List[String]]
I have running Code, but I have the problem that it takes very long to execute it. For only a bunch of hundred signals it needs about 13 minutes.
This is the inputDataFrame I got in the beginning (example):
+----------+-----+
|SignalName|Value|
+----------+-----+
| S1| V1|
| S2| V1|
| S1| V2|
| S2| V2|
| S3| V1|
| S1| V3|
| S1| V1|
+----------+-----+
Then I want to filter the duplicates
var reducedDF = inputDataFrame.select("SignalName","Value").dropDuplicates()
The ouput for reduedDF.show :
+----------+-----+
|SignalName|Value|
+----------+-----+
| S1| V1|
| S1| V2|
| S1| V3|
| S2| V1|
| S2| V2|
| S3| V1|
+----------+-----+
The next step is to get an RDD of SignalNames without an duplicate. And I used zipWithIndex(), because later I want to read every value of the RDD. I can do this with the following code:
var RDDOfSignalNames = reducedDF.select("SignalName").rdd.map(r => r(0).asInstanceOf[String])
RDDOfSignalNames = RDDOfSignalNames.distinct()
val RDDwithIndex = RDDOfSignalNames.zipWithIndex()
val indexKey = RDDwithIndex.map { case (k, v) => (v, k) }
And now the last step is to get for every SignalName every possible Value as a List of Type List[String] and add it to an Map:
var dataTmp: DataFrame = null
var signalname = Seq[String]("")
var map = scala.collection.mutable.Map[String, List[String]]()
for (i <- 0 to (RDDOfSignalNames.count()).toInt - 1) {
signalname = indexKey.lookup(i)
dataTmp = reducedDF.filter(data.col("Signalname").contains(signalname(0)))
map += (signalname(0) -> dataTmp.rdd.map(r => r(0).asInstanceOf[String]).collect().toList)
println(i+"/"+(RDDOfSignalNames.count().toInt - 1).toString())
}
In the End the Map looks like this:
scala.collection.mutable.Map[String,List[String]] = Map(S1 -> List(V1, V2, V3), S3 -> List(V1), S2 -> List(V1, V2))
The Problem is the line map += ... for 106 Signals it takes about 13 minutes! Is there more efficient way to do this?
First of all, use of var
is not recommended in scala . You should always try to use immutable variables . So changing the following line
var reducedDF = inputDataFrame.select("SignalName","Value").dropDuplicates()
to
val reducedDF = inputDataFrame.select("SignalName","Value").distinct()
is preferred.
And ,
You don't need to go through such complexities to get your desired output. You can get your desired output doing the following
import org.apache.spark.sql.functions.collect_list
reducedDF
.groupBy("SignalName")
.agg(collect_list($"Value").as("Value"))
.rdd
.map(row => (row(0).toString -> row(1).asInstanceOf[scala.collection.mutable.WrappedArray[String]].toList))
.collectAsMap()
where,
reducedDF.groupBy("SignalName").agg(collect_list($"Value").as("Value"))
gives you dataframe
as
+----------+------------+
|SignalName|Value |
+----------+------------+
|S3 |[V1] |
|S2 |[V2, V1] |
|S1 |[V1, V2, V3]|
+----------+------------+
the rest of the code .rdd.map(row => (row(0).toString -> row(1).asInstanceOf[scala.collection.mutable.WrappedArray[String]].toList)).collectAsMap()
is just converting the dataframe
to your desired output Map
.
final map output is
Map(S1 -> List(V1, V2, V3), S3 -> List(V1), S2 -> List(V2, V1))
The technical post webpages of this site follow the CC BY-SA 4.0 protocol. If you need to reprint, please indicate the site URL or the original address.Any question please contact:yoyou2525@163.com.