This is my code:
var pushRef = currentAssignment.child('answers').push().catch(e => console.log('push', e));
pushRef.set({
// downloadURL: downURL,
textAnswer: textAnswer,
date: this.generateDate(),
seen: false,
// firebaseKey: pushRef.getKey(),
workKey: this.props.questionId
})
When I try to run it, I get this error: pushRef.set()
, but according to this part of the documentation it looks to me like I'm doing everything the same way. Here's Google's example of push instruction:
var postsRef = ref.child("posts");
var newPostRef = postsRef.push();
newPostRef
.set({
author: "gracehop",
title: "Announcing COBOL, a New Programming Language"
});
// we can also chain the two calls together
postsRef
.push()
.set({
author: "alanisawesome",
title: "The Turing Machine"
});
So what am I missing?
By adding .catch(e => console.log('push', e))
behind push()
you change it from a firebase database reference to something else. So removing that will fix this.
As far as I know calling push()
(without parameters) will never generate an error, it simply generates a firebase reference (unique key) client side.
Your code is expecting that catch()
returns a database reference. It doesn't - catch()
always returns a promise.
The use of catch here is unnecessary because push() with no arguments is a completely local operation. It returns a database reference that can also be used like a promise (a ThenableReference ).
If there is any error to possibly catch here, it's on the promise returned by set() . That call will fail if security rules are violated during the write operation.
The technical post webpages of this site follow the CC BY-SA 4.0 protocol. If you need to reprint, please indicate the site URL or the original address.Any question please contact:yoyou2525@163.com.