I have two code examples for catching promise error. What is better way and why is that so?
I have this code with .catch()
Message.receive($scope.reference).then(function (response) {
// on success
}).catch(function (error) {
// on error
});
Also I have this code, without .catch()
Message.receive($scope.reference).then(function (response) {
// on success
}, function (error) {
// on error
});
foo.then(success, error)
executes one or the other callback based on whether foo
raised an error or not. If success
raises an error, you'll get an uncaught error, unless you chain another .catch
.
foo.then(success).catch(error)
catches any error raised by foo
or success
. If foo
raises an error, success
is skipped.
It's not which is better, it depends on what error handling chain you want to establish.
The technical post webpages of this site follow the CC BY-SA 4.0 protocol. If you need to reprint, please indicate the site URL or the original address.Any question please contact:yoyou2525@163.com.