I'm writing two joint decoders in Keras, with one common input, two separate outputs, and a loss function that takes both outputs into account. The problem that I have is with the loss function.
Here is the minimal Keras code that you can reproduce the error:
import tensorflow as tf
from scat import *
from keras.layers import Input, Reshape, Permute, Lambda, Flatten
from keras.layers.core import Dense
from keras.layers.advanced_activations import LeakyReLU
from keras.models import Model
from keras import backend as K
def identity(x):
return K.identity(x)
# custom loss function
def custom_loss():
def my_loss(y_dummy, pred):
fcn_loss_1 = tf.nn.softmax_cross_entropy_with_logits(labels=y_dummy[0], logits=pred[0])
fcn_loss_2 = tf.nn.softmax_cross_entropy_with_logits(labels=y_dummy[1], logits=pred[1])
fcn_loss_2 = tf.matrix_band_part(fcn_loss_2, 0, -1) - tf.matrix_band_part(fcn_loss_2, 0, 0)
fcn_loss = tf.reduce_mean(fcn_loss_1) + 2 * tf.reduce_mean(fcn_loss_2)
return fcn_loss
return my_loss
def keras_version():
input = Input(shape=(135,), name='feature_input')
out1 = Dense(128, kernel_initializer='glorot_normal', activation='linear')(input)
out1 = LeakyReLU(alpha=.2)(out1)
out1 = Dense(256, kernel_initializer='glorot_normal', activation='linear')(out1)
out1 = LeakyReLU(alpha=.2)(out1)
out1 = Dense(512, kernel_initializer='glorot_normal', activation='linear')(out1)
out1 = LeakyReLU(alpha=.2)(out1)
out1 = Dense(45, kernel_initializer='glorot_normal', activation='linear')(out1)
out1 = LeakyReLU(alpha=.2)(out1)
out1 = Reshape((9, 5))(out1)
out2 = Dense(128, kernel_initializer='glorot_normal', activation='linear')(input)
out2 = LeakyReLU(alpha=.2)(out2)
out2 = Dense(256, kernel_initializer='glorot_normal', activation='linear')(out2)
out2 = LeakyReLU(alpha=.2)(out2)
out2 = Dense(512, kernel_initializer='glorot_normal', activation='linear')(out2)
out2 = LeakyReLU(alpha=.2)(out2)
out2 = Dense(540, kernel_initializer='glorot_normal', activation='linear')(out2)
out2 = LeakyReLU(alpha=.2)(out2)
out2 = Reshape((9, 4, 15))(out2)
out2 = Lambda(lambda x: K.dot(K.permute_dimensions(x, (0, 2, 1, 3)),
K.permute_dimensions(x, (0, 2, 3, 1))), output_shape=(4,9,9))(out2)
out2 = Flatten()(out2)
out2 = Dense(324, kernel_initializer='glorot_normal', activation='linear')(out2)
out2 = LeakyReLU(alpha=.2)(out2)
out2 = Reshape((4, 9, 9))(out2)
out2 = Lambda(lambda x: K.permute_dimensions(x, (0, 2, 3, 1)))(out2)
out1 = Lambda(identity, name='output_1')(out1)
out2 = Lambda(identity, name='output_2')(out2)
return Model(input, [out1, out2])
model = keras_version()
model.compile(loss=custom_loss(), optimizer='adam')
model.summary()
feature_final = np.random.normal(0,1,[5000, 9, 15])
train_features_array = np.random.normal(0,1,[5000, 9, 5])
train_adj_array = np.random.normal(0,1,[5000, 9, 9, 4])
feature_final = feature_final.reshape(-1, 135)
model.fit(feature_final, [train_features_array, train_adj_array],
batch_size=50,
epochs=10
)
The error I get is:
File "...", line 135, in <module>
epochs=10
File ".../keras/engine/training.py", line 1039, in fit
validation_steps=validation_steps)
File ".../keras/backend/tensorflow_backend.py", line 2675, in _call
fetched = self._callable_fn(*array_vals)
File ".../tensorflow/python/client/session.py", line 1458, in __call__
run_metadata_ptr)
tensorflow.python.framework.errors_impl.InvalidArgumentError: input must be at least 2-dim, received shape: [9]
[[{{node loss/output_1_loss/MatrixBandPart_1}}]]
On a second attempt, I tried writing two loss functions and using loss weights to combine them.
# custom loss function
def custom_loss_1():
def my_loss_1(y_dummy, pred):
fcn_loss_1 = tf.nn.softmax_cross_entropy_with_logits(labels=y_dummy[0], logits=pred[0])
return tf.reduce_mean(fcn_loss_1)
return my_loss_1
def custom_loss_2():
def my_loss_2(y_dummy, pred):
fcn_loss_2 = tf.nn.softmax_cross_entropy_with_logits(labels=y_dummy[1], logits=pred[1])
fcn_loss_2 = tf.matrix_band_part(fcn_loss_2, 0, -1) - tf.matrix_band_part(fcn_loss_2, 0, 0)
return tf.reduce_mean(fcn_loss_2)
return my_loss_2
model.compile(loss={'output_1':custom_loss_1(), 'output_2':custom_loss_2()},
loss_weights={'output_1':1.0, 'output_2':2.0}, optimizer='adam')
but I received
tensorflow.python.framework.errors_impl.InvalidArgumentError: Matrix size-incompatible: In[0]: [20,25920], In[1]: [324,324]
[[{{node dense_9/BiasAdd}}]]
In that case, the problem might actually be from the model itself. Here is the model.summary
:
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
Layer (type) Output Shape Param # Connected to
==================================================================================================
feature_input (InputLayer) (None, 135) 0
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
dense_5 (Dense) (None, 128) 17408 feature_input[0][0]
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
leaky_re_lu_5 (LeakyReLU) (None, 128) 0 dense_5[0][0]
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
dense_6 (Dense) (None, 256) 33024 leaky_re_lu_5[0][0]
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
leaky_re_lu_6 (LeakyReLU) (None, 256) 0 dense_6[0][0]
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
dense_7 (Dense) (None, 512) 131584 leaky_re_lu_6[0][0]
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
leaky_re_lu_7 (LeakyReLU) (None, 512) 0 dense_7[0][0]
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
dense_1 (Dense) (None, 128) 17408 feature_input[0][0]
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
dense_8 (Dense) (None, 540) 277020 leaky_re_lu_7[0][0]
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
leaky_re_lu_1 (LeakyReLU) (None, 128) 0 dense_1[0][0]
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
leaky_re_lu_8 (LeakyReLU) (None, 540) 0 dense_8[0][0]
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
dense_2 (Dense) (None, 256) 33024 leaky_re_lu_1[0][0]
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
reshape_2 (Reshape) (None, 9, 4, 15) 0 leaky_re_lu_8[0][0]
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
leaky_re_lu_2 (LeakyReLU) (None, 256) 0 dense_2[0][0]
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
lambda_1 (Lambda) (None, 4, 9, 9) 0 reshape_2[0][0]
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
dense_3 (Dense) (None, 512) 131584 leaky_re_lu_2[0][0]
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
flatten_1 (Flatten) (None, 324) 0 lambda_1[0][0]
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
leaky_re_lu_3 (LeakyReLU) (None, 512) 0 dense_3[0][0]
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
dense_9 (Dense) (None, 324) 105300 flatten_1[0][0]
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
dense_4 (Dense) (None, 45) 23085 leaky_re_lu_3[0][0]
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
leaky_re_lu_9 (LeakyReLU) (None, 324) 0 dense_9[0][0]
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
leaky_re_lu_4 (LeakyReLU) (None, 45) 0 dense_4[0][0]
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
reshape_3 (Reshape) (None, 4, 9, 9) 0 leaky_re_lu_9[0][0]
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
reshape_1 (Reshape) (None, 9, 5) 0 leaky_re_lu_4[0][0]
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
lambda_2 (Lambda) (None, 9, 9, 4) 0 reshape_3[0][0]
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
output_1 (Lambda) (None, 9, 5) 0 reshape_1[0][0]
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
output_2 (Lambda) (None, 9, 9, 4) 0 lambda_2[0][0]
==================================================================================================
Total params: 769,437
Trainable params: 769,437
Non-trainable params: 0
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
If you think the model has an issue, please check "model" . This question is different from this question which uses only one output in the loss. Here is also the loss function from a similar model that was written in Tensorflow:
# -- loss function
Y_1 = tf.placeholder(tf.float32, shape=[None, 9, 9, 4])
Y_2 = tf.placeholder(tf.float32, shape=[None, 9, 5])
loss_1 = tf.nn.softmax_cross_entropy_with_logits(labels=Y_2, logits=fcn(X)[0])
loss_2 = tf.nn.softmax_cross_entropy_with_logits(labels=Y_1, logits=fcn(X)[1])
loss_2 = tf.matrix_band_part(loss_2, 0, -1) - tf.matrix_band_part(loss_2, 0, 0)
loss = tf.reduce_mean(loss_1) + 2 * tf.reduce_mean(loss_2)
Edits: I tried the code in the answer with the actual dataset, and loss function shows a different behavior from Tensorflow implementation of the code. The loss function suggested in the answers converges quickly and becomes nan. I agree with the answer which says output_1 should be categorical. Based on this, I wrote the following loss function, which still does not converge as fast as Tensorflow one, but definitly does not blow up:
def custom_loss_1(model, output_1):
""" This loss function is called for output2
It needs to fetch model.output[0] and the output_1 predictions in
order to calculate fcn_loss_1
"""
def my_loss(y_true, y_pred):
fcn_loss_1 = tf.nn.softmax_cross_entropy_with_logits(labels=model.targets[0], logits=output_1)
return tf.reduce_mean(fcn_loss_1)
return my_loss
def custom_loss_2():
""" This loss function is called for output2
It needs to fetch model.output[0] and the output_1 predictions in
order to calculate fcn_loss_1
"""
def my_loss(y_true, y_pred):
fcn_loss_2 = tf.nn.softmax_cross_entropy_with_logits(labels=y_true, logits=y_pred)
fcn_loss_2 = tf.matrix_band_part(fcn_loss_2, 0, -1) - tf.matrix_band_part(fcn_loss_2, 0, 0)
return tf.reduce_mean(fcn_loss_2)
return my_loss
output_layer_1 = [layer for layer in model.layers if layer.name == 'output_1'][0]
losses = {'output_1': custom_loss_1(model, output_layer_1.output), 'output_2': custom_loss_2()}
model.compile(loss=losses, optimizer='adam', loss_weights=[1.0, 2.0])
You had two issues in your code:
The first is that the K.dot
operation inside the Lambda
needed to be K.batch_dot
I used:
def output_mult(x):
a = K.permute_dimensions(x, (0, 2, 1, 3))
b = K.permute_dimensions(x, (0, 2, 3, 1))
return K.batch_dot(a, b)
out2 = Lambda(output_mult)(out2)
It helps to actually let Keras compute the output dimensions. It is an easy way to check the code. In order to debug it, I first replaced the custom loss with an exists loss ( mse
) and this was easy to detect.
Second issue is that a custom loss function takes a single pair of target / output rather than a list. The arguments to a loss function are not a list of tensors as you assumed both initially and in your edit. So I defined your loss function as
def custom_loss(model, output_1):
""" This loss function is called for output2
It needs to fetch model.output[0] and the output_1 predictions in
order to calculate fcn_loss_1
"""
def my_loss(y_true, y_pred):
fcn_loss_1 = tf.nn.softmax_cross_entropy_with_logits(labels=model.targets[0], logits=output_1)
fcn_loss_2 = tf.nn.softmax_cross_entropy_with_logits(labels=y_true, logits=y_pred)
fcn_loss_2 = tf.matrix_band_part(fcn_loss_2, 0, -1) - tf.matrix_band_part(fcn_loss_2, 0, 0)
return tf.reduce_mean(fcn_loss_2)
return my_loss
And used it as
output_layer_1 = [layer for layer in model.layers if layer.name == 'output_1'][0]
losses = {'output_1': 'categorical_crossentropy', 'output_2': custom_loss(model, output_layer_1.output)}
model.compile(loss=losses, optimizer='adam', loss_weights=[1.0, 2.0])
Edit: I initially misread the custom loss for output2 as requiring the value of fcn_loss_1
, this doesn't seem to be the case and you can just write this as:
def custom_loss():
def my_loss(y_true, y_pred):
fcn_loss_2 = tf.nn.softmax_cross_entropy_with_logits(labels=y_true, logits=y_pred)
fcn_loss_2 = tf.matrix_band_part(fcn_loss_2, 0, -1) - tf.matrix_band_part(fcn_loss_2, 0, 0)
return tf.reduce_mean(fcn_loss_2)
return my_loss
And used it as:
losses = {'output_1': 'categorical_crossentropy', 'output_2': custom_loss()}
model.compile(loss=losses, optimizer='adam', loss_weights=[1.0, 2.0])
I'm making the assumption that the loss for output_1 is categorical_crossentropy
. But even if you need to change it, the simplest way to do it is to have 2 independent loss functions. Of course you can also choose to define a loss function that returns 0 and one that returns the full cost... but it would be cleaner to split the 'loss(output1) + 2 * loss(output2)' in two loss plus the weights, imho.
Full notebook: https://colab.research.google.com/drive/1NG3uIiesg-VIt-W9254Sea2XXUYPoVH5
The technical post webpages of this site follow the CC BY-SA 4.0 protocol. If you need to reprint, please indicate the site URL or the original address.Any question please contact:yoyou2525@163.com.