here is the example I want to ask
this following brief shapes of architecture
□ <--------> □ <----------> □
↓ ↓ ↓ ↓ ↓
private subnet----- networking(A)----- private subnet ----- networking(C) ------ private subnet
following considering conditions
I want to ask you
according to above pretenses,
there is already internet facing load balancer
but at this point
I want to ask you
Q. 1 Do I need "additional" Load balancers to communicate and build network between private subnets?
especially
Q. 2 Do I have to put Load balancer inbetween private subnets which is pointing "network A section" or "network C section"?
Q. 2' DO I need to put Load balancer in networking A section or networking C section to build network with each other? (sending http packets, communicate, build network)
You don't need a load balancer to facilitate communication between subnets. You need to have routes defined in route table associated with the subnet. Usually you will see a routes similar to 10.0.0.1/16 => local
where the 10.0.0.1/16
is the CIDR of the VPC. Local route allows to communicate with in the VPC. So The subnet can communicate with other subnets with in the VPC. So all you need is a local route.
A load balancer is used for a completely different reason. An example scenario would be, when you have a multiple web server instances that serves the http web traffic, You can add a load balancer in front of the instances to distribute the traffic between the instances. You can prevent single server from getting overloaded by using a load balancer and distribute the load to multiple servers.
The technical post webpages of this site follow the CC BY-SA 4.0 protocol. If you need to reprint, please indicate the site URL or the original address.Any question please contact:yoyou2525@163.com.