简体   繁体   中英

Should I use xSemaphoreGiveFromISR() or xSemaphoreGive() in STM32 HAL interrupt callbacks?

I've implemented a fault task in the FreeRTOS which is taking a binary semaphore used as a fault flag. That fault flag is triggered by the STM32 HAL error callback functions, such as HAL_I2C_ErrorCallback or HAL_UART_ErrorCallback . If an error occurs, error callbacks functions will call signalFault() function, which will raise the fault flag by giving the binary semaphore.

My question is: is my signalFault() function treated as an interrupt service routine (ISR) or not, because it is being called in the HAL ISR error callbacks? Do I need to call xSemaphoreGiveFromISR() or xSemaphoreGive() function in signalFault() function to raise the fault flag?

Sure, you should use xSemaphoreGiveFromISR if the calling context is an ISR. A function called from an ISR is still part of the ISR.

If you do not trust us then simple check if you are in the interrupt. It will be 100% safe.

int isInISR( void ) 
{
    return ( portNVIC_INT_CTRL_REG & portVECTACTIVE_MASK );
}

and in your code:

if(isInISR()) xSemaphoreGiveFromISR(...);
else xSemaphoreGive(...);

The technical post webpages of this site follow the CC BY-SA 4.0 protocol. If you need to reprint, please indicate the site URL or the original address.Any question please contact:yoyou2525@163.com.

 
粤ICP备18138465号  © 2020-2024 STACKOOM.COM