I would like to filter rows by a function of each row, eg
def f(row):
return sin(row['velocity'])/np.prod(['masses']) > 5
df = pandas.DataFrame(...)
filtered = df[apply_to_all_rows(df, f)]
Or for another more complex, contrived example,
def g(row):
if row['col1'].method1() == 1:
val = row['col1'].method2() / row['col1'].method3(row['col3'], row['col4'])
else:
val = row['col2'].method5(row['col6'])
return np.sin(val)
df = pandas.DataFrame(...)
filtered = df[apply_to_all_rows(df, g)]
How can I do so?
You can do this using DataFrame.apply
, which applies a function along a given axis,
In [3]: df = pandas.DataFrame(np.random.randn(5, 3), columns=['a', 'b', 'c'])
In [4]: df
Out[4]:
a b c
0 -0.001968 -1.877945 -1.515674
1 -0.540628 0.793913 -0.983315
2 -1.313574 1.946410 0.826350
3 0.015763 -0.267860 -2.228350
4 0.563111 1.195459 0.343168
In [6]: df[df.apply(lambda x: x['b'] > x['c'], axis=1)]
Out[6]:
a b c
1 -0.540628 0.793913 -0.983315
2 -1.313574 1.946410 0.826350
3 0.015763 -0.267860 -2.228350
4 0.563111 1.195459 0.343168
Suppose I had a DataFrame as follows:
In [39]: df
Out[39]:
mass1 mass2 velocity
0 1.461711 -0.404452 0.722502
1 -2.169377 1.131037 0.232047
2 0.009450 -0.868753 0.598470
3 0.602463 0.299249 0.474564
4 -0.675339 -0.816702 0.799289
I can use sin and DataFrame.prod to create a boolean mask:
In [40]: mask = (np.sin(df.velocity) / df.ix[:, 0:2].prod(axis=1)) > 0
In [41]: mask
Out[41]:
0 False
1 False
2 False
3 True
4 True
Then use the mask to select from the DataFrame:
In [42]: df[mask]
Out[42]:
mass1 mass2 velocity
3 0.602463 0.299249 0.474564
4 -0.675339 -0.816702 0.799289
Specify reduce=True
to handle empty DataFrames as well.
import pandas as pd
t = pd.DataFrame(columns=['a', 'b'])
t[t.apply(lambda x: x['a'] > 1, axis=1, reduce=True)]
I canot comment on duckworthd's answer , but it is not perfectly working. It crashes when the dataframe is empty:
df = pandas.DataFrame(columns=['a', 'b', 'c'])
df[df.apply(lambda x: x['b'] > x['c'], axis=1)]
Outputs:
ValueError: Must pass DataFrame with boolean values only
To me it looks like a bug in pandas, since { } is definitively a valid set of boolean values. For a solution refer to Roy Hyunjin Han's answer .
The best approach I've found is, instead of using reduce=True
to avoid errors for empty df (since this arg is deprecated anyway), just check that df size > 0 before applying the filter:
def my_filter(row):
if row.columnA == something:
return True
return False
if len(df.index) > 0:
df[df.apply(my_filter, axis=1)]
You can use the loc
property for slice you dataframe.
According documentation , loc
can have a callable function
as argument.
In [3]: df = pandas.DataFrame(np.random.randn(5, 3), columns=['a', 'b', 'c'])
In [4]: df
Out[4]:
a b c
0 -0.001968 -1.877945 -1.515674
1 -0.540628 0.793913 -0.983315
2 -1.313574 1.946410 0.826350
3 0.015763 -0.267860 -2.228350
4 0.563111 1.195459 0.343168
# define lambda function
In [5]: myfilter = lambda x: x['b'] > x['c']
# use my lambda in loc
In [6]: df1 = df.loc[fif]
if you want to combine your filter function fif
with other filter criteria
df1 = df.loc[fif].loc[(df.b >= 0.5)]
The technical post webpages of this site follow the CC BY-SA 4.0 protocol. If you need to reprint, please indicate the site URL or the original address.Any question please contact:yoyou2525@163.com.