[英]Maximum Product Subarray issue
这是问题和代码(我搜索了解决方案,大多数都相似,发布一个易于阅读的),我的问题是以下两行,
imax = max(A[i], imax * A[i]);
imin = min(A[i], imin * A[i]);
为什么我们需要单独考虑 A[i] 以及为什么不写为,
imax = max(imin * A[i], imax * A[i]);
imin = min(imin * A[i], imax * A[i]);
找出具有最大乘积的数组(至少包含一个数字)中的连续子数组。
例如,给定数组 [2,3,-2,4],连续子数组 [2,3] 的最大乘积 = 6。
int maxProduct(int A[], int n) {
// store the result that is the max we have found so far
int r = A[0];
// imax/imin stores the max/min product of
// subarray that ends with the current number A[i]
for (int i = 1, imax = r, imin = r; i < n; i++) {
// multiplied by a negative makes big number smaller, small number bigger
// so we redefine the extremums by swapping them
if (A[i] < 0)
swap(imax, imin);
// max/min product for the current number is either the current number itself
// or the max/min by the previous number times the current one
imax = max(A[i], imax * A[i]);
imin = min(A[i], imin * A[i]);
// the newly computed max value is a candidate for our global result
r = max(r, imax);
}
return r;
}
提前致谢,林
imax = max(A[i], imax * A[i]);
当你单独考虑A[i]
你基本上考虑了从A[i]
开始的序列。
当你最初用A[0]
初始化imin
和imax
时,你正在做类似的事情。
对于imin
案例imin
如此。
小例子:
Array = {-4, 3, 8 , 5}
初始化: imin = -4, imax = -4
迭代1: i=1 , A[i]=3
imax = max(A[i], imax * A[i]);
- > imax = max(3, -4 * 3);
- > imax = 3
因此,当imax
为负且A[i]
为正时, A[i]
可以是最大的。
public class MaximumContiguousSubArrayProduct {
public static int getMaximumContiguousSubArrayProduct(final int... array) {
if (array.length == 0) {
return -1;
}
int negativeMax = 0, positiveMax = 0, max;
if (array[0] < 0) {
negativeMax = array[0];
max = negativeMax;
} else {
positiveMax = array[0];
max = positiveMax;
}
for (int i = 1; i < array.length; i++) {
if (array[i] == 0) {
negativeMax = 0;
positiveMax = 0;
if (max < 0) {
max = 0;
}
} else if (array[i] > 0) {
if (positiveMax == 0) {
positiveMax = array[i];
} else {
positiveMax *= array[i];
}
if (negativeMax != 0) {
negativeMax *= array[i];
}
if (positiveMax > max) {
max = positiveMax;
}
} else {
if (array[i] > max) {
max = array[i];
}
if (negativeMax == 0) {
if (positiveMax != 0) {
negativeMax *= positiveMax;
} else {
negativeMax = array[i];
}
positiveMax = 0;
} else {
if (positiveMax != 0) {
int temp = positiveMax;
positiveMax = negativeMax * array[i];
negativeMax = temp * array[i];
} else {
positiveMax = negativeMax * array[i];
negativeMax = array[i];
}
if (positiveMax > max) {
max = positiveMax;
}
}
}
}
return max;
}
}
对应测试:
import org.junit.Test;
import static org.hamcrest.CoreMatchers.equalTo;
import static org.hamcrest.MatcherAssert.assertThat;
public class MaximumContiguousSubArrayProductTest {
@Test
public void testMaximumProductSubArray() {
assertThat(MaximumContiguousSubArrayProduct.getMaximumContiguousSubArrayProduct(2, 3, -2, 4), equalTo(6));
assertThat(MaximumContiguousSubArrayProduct.getMaximumContiguousSubArrayProduct(2, 3, -2, 4, 9), equalTo(36));
assertThat(MaximumContiguousSubArrayProduct.getMaximumContiguousSubArrayProduct(-2, 0, -1), equalTo(0));
assertThat(MaximumContiguousSubArrayProduct.getMaximumContiguousSubArrayProduct(), equalTo(-1));
assertThat(MaximumContiguousSubArrayProduct.getMaximumContiguousSubArrayProduct(-1), equalTo(-1));
assertThat(MaximumContiguousSubArrayProduct.getMaximumContiguousSubArrayProduct(1), equalTo(1));
assertThat(MaximumContiguousSubArrayProduct.getMaximumContiguousSubArrayProduct(-9, -3, -4, -1), equalTo(9 * 3 * 4));
assertThat(MaximumContiguousSubArrayProduct.getMaximumContiguousSubArrayProduct(-1, 2), equalTo(2));
assertThat(MaximumContiguousSubArrayProduct.getMaximumContiguousSubArrayProduct(-100, -1, 99), equalTo(9900));
}
}
声明:本站的技术帖子网页,遵循CC BY-SA 4.0协议,如果您需要转载,请注明本站网址或者原文地址。任何问题请咨询:yoyou2525@163.com.