[英]Does a COM object get released by the CLR when the thread that created it terminates?
[英]Does matter COM object not assigned to var is not released?
如果我使用这样的代码,将释放所有非托管COM对象
var worksheet = new Application().Workbooks.Add().Worksheets.Add();
Marshal.ReleaseComObject(worksheet);
而不是像这样的代码
var excel = new Application();
var workbook = excel.Workbooks.Add();
var worksheet = workbook.Worksheets.Add();
Marshal.ReleaseComObject(excel);
Marshal.ReleaseComObject(workbook);
Marshal.ReleaseComObject(worksheet);
?
如果有一些文档,请发送回答链接。
实际上,两个代码示例都将在后台运行Excel进程。 例如,您需要在应用程序对象上调用Application.Quit()
。 以下作品:
private static void DoExcel()
{
var application = new Application();
var workbook = application.Workbooks.Add();
var worksheet = workbook.Worksheets.Add();
// Name that this will be saved as
string name = workbook.FullName + ".xlsx";
string fullPath = Path.Combine(Directory.GetCurrentDirectory(), name);
// If a file of the same name exists, delete it so that we won't be prompted if
// we want to overwrite it when we save
if (File.Exists(fullPath))
File.Delete(fullPath);
// Save the workbook - otherwise we may be prompted as to whether we want to save when we go to quit
workbook.Save();
// Quit the application
application.Quit();
// Release the references
Marshal.ReleaseComObject(worksheet);
Marshal.ReleaseComObject(workbook);
Marshal.ReleaseComObject(application);
// Release the .NET reference and run the garbage collector now to make sure the application is closed immediately
worksheet = null;
GC.Collect();
GC.WaitForPendingFinalizers();
}
还有一些值得记住的好东西:我没有在这里使用它,但是有一个Marshal.FinalReleaseComObject方法在这些情况下非常有用。 此外,我再次在我的代码示例中没有使用它,但Marshal.ReleaseComObject
方法返回当前计数,因此如果您想确保计数达到零,您可以始终在循环中执行释放:
while (Marshal.ReleaseComObject(comObject) > 0) { }
您也可以将其用于调试目的 - 例如
int count = Marshal.ReleaseComObject(comObject);
Trace.TraceInformation("Current COM object reference count: " + count.ToString());
声明:本站的技术帖子网页,遵循CC BY-SA 4.0协议,如果您需要转载,请注明本站网址或者原文地址。任何问题请咨询:yoyou2525@163.com.