繁体   English   中英

具有相同哈希值的对象应该相等吗?

[英]Should to objects which have the same hash be equal?

在下面的示例中,我创建了两个具有完全相同内部结构的对象。 两者都只携带值 1 作为实例变量。 我的想法是,如果我取e1的哈希值,它应该与e2的哈希值相同,因此e1.equals(e2)应该返回 true。

class EqualsChecker {

    public static void main(String[] args) {

        Elem e1 = new Elem(1);
        Elem e2 = new Elem(1);


        System.out.println(e1);                                // EqualsChecker$Elem@6ff3c5b5
        System.out.println(e2);                                // EqualsChecker$Elem@3764951d
        System.out.println("e1.equals(e2): " + e1.equals(e2)); // returns false
    }


    static class Elem {
        private int v;
        public Elem(int i) {
            this.v = i;
        }   
    }   
}

为什么这里的equals返回 false? 我想我在下面的草图中有中间情况: 在此处输入图片说明

equals(Object)的默认实现检查两个对象是否是同一个实例(即它们是== )。 如果你想要一些不同的逻辑,你必须自己实现它。 请注意,如果您这样做,您还应该实现自己的hashCode() ,以便两个相等的对象也将具有匹配的哈希码。 例如:

class Elem {
    private int v;

    @Override
    public boolean equals(final Object o) {
        if (o == null || this.getClass() != o.getClass()) {
            return false;
        }
        Elem elem = (Elem) o;
        return this.v == elem.v;
    }

    @Override
    public int hashCode() {
        return this.v;
    }
}

https://docs.oracle.com/javase/9​​/docs/api/java/lang/Object.html#hashCode看以下几点——

  1. 在 Java 应用程序执行期间,只要在同一个对象上多次调用它,hashCode 方法必须始终返回相同的整数,前提是在对象的 equals 比较中使用的信息没有被修改。 该整数不需要从应用程序的一次执行到同一应用程序的另一次执行保持一致。
  2. 如果根据 equals(Object) 方法两个对象相等,则对两个对象中的每一个调用 hashCode 方法必须产生相同的整数结果。
  3. 如果根据 equals(java.lang.Object) 方法两个对象不相等,则不需要对两个对象中的每一个调用 hashCode 方法必须产生不同的整数结果。 但是,程序员应该意识到为不相等的对象生成不同的整数结果可能会提高哈希表的性能。
  4. 尽可能实用,类 Object 定义的 hashCode 方法确实为不同的对象返回不同的整数。 (在某个时间点,hashCode 可能会也可能不会被实现为对象内存地址的某个函数。)

现在,查看以下代码及其输出:

class MyEmployee {
    String code;
    String name;
    int age;

    public MyEmployee(String code, String name, int age) {
        super();
        this.code = code;
        this.name = name;
        this.age = age;
    }
}

public class Main {
    public static void main(String[] args) {
        MyEmployee employee1 = new MyEmployee("AB12", "Dhruv", 24);
        MyEmployee employee2 = new MyEmployee("AB12", "Dhruv", 24);
        MyEmployee employee3 = employee1;
        System.out.println(employee1.equals(employee3));
        System.out.println("employee1.hashCode(): " + employee1.hashCode());
        System.out.println("employee3.hashCode(): " + employee3.hashCode());
        System.out.println(employee1.equals(employee2));
        System.out.println("employee2.hashCode(): " + employee2.hashCode());
    }
}

输出:

true
employee1.hashCode(): 511833308
employee3.hashCode(): 511833308
false
employee2.hashCode(): 1297685781

由于employee3指向同一对象employee1 ,你所得到的相同的哈希码为他们而employee2指向一个不同的对象(尽管它具有相同的内容,关键字, new会在内存中创建一个单独的对象),因此,您可能很少从文档状态中获得与上面提到的第 4 点相同的employee2哈希码: As much as is reasonably practical, the hashCode method defined by class Object does return distinct integers for distinct objects.

您必须以某种方式覆盖hashCode方法,该方法应该为具有相同内容的两个对象返回相同的哈希码,例如

class MyEmployee {
    String code;
    String name;
    int age;

    public MyEmployee(String code, String name, int age) {
        super();
        this.code = code;
        this.name = name;
        this.age = age;
    }

    @Override
    public int hashCode() {
        final int prime = 31;
        int result = 1;
        result = prime * result + age;
        result = prime * result + ((code == null) ? 0 : code.hashCode());
        result = prime * result + ((name == null) ? 0 : name.hashCode());
        return result;
    }   
}

public class Main {
    public static void main(String[] args) {
        MyEmployee employee1 = new MyEmployee("AB12", "Dhruv", 24);
        MyEmployee employee2 = new MyEmployee("AB12", "Dhruv", 24);
        MyEmployee employee3 = employee1;
        System.out.println(employee1.equals(employee3));
        System.out.println("employee1.hashCode(): " + employee1.hashCode());
        System.out.println("employee3.hashCode(): " + employee3.hashCode());
        System.out.println(employee1.equals(employee2));
        System.out.println("employee2.hashCode(): " + employee2.hashCode());
    }
}

输出:

true
employee1.hashCode(): 128107556
employee3.hashCode(): 128107556
false
employee2.hashCode(): 128107556

上面给出的hashCode的实现为employee1employee2生成相同的hashcode,即使equals返回false (检查文档中提到的第3 点)。

覆盖hashCode错误方式可能会导致即使相同的对象返回不同的哈希码,例如

class MyEmployee {
    String code;
    String name;
    int age;

    public MyEmployee(String code, String name, int age) {
        super();
        this.code = code;
        this.name = name;
        this.age = age;
    }

    @Override
    public int hashCode() {
        final int prime = 31;
        int result = 1;
        result = prime * result + age;
        result = prime * result + ((code == null) ? 0 : (int) (code.length() * (Math.random() * 100)));
        result = prime * result + ((name == null) ? 0 : name.hashCode());
        return result;
    }
}

public class Main {
    public static void main(String[] args) {
        MyEmployee employee1 = new MyEmployee("AB12", "Dhruv", 24);
        MyEmployee employee2 = new MyEmployee("AB12", "Dhruv", 24);
        MyEmployee employee3 = employee1;
        System.out.println(employee1.equals(employee3));
        System.out.println("employee1.hashCode(): " + employee1.hashCode());
        System.out.println("employee1.hashCode() again: " + employee1.hashCode());
        System.out.println("employee3.hashCode(): " + employee3.hashCode());
        System.out.println(employee1.equals(employee2));
        System.out.println("employee2.hashCode(): " + employee2.hashCode());
    }
}

输出:

true
employee1.hashCode(): 66066760
employee1.hashCode() again: 66069457
employee3.hashCode(): 66073797
false
employee2.hashCode(): 66074882

这是覆盖hashCode的错误方法,因为在 Java 应用程序执行期间多次调用同一个对象上的hashCode必须始终如一地返回相同的整数(检查文档中提到的第 1 点)。

现在,查看以下代码及其输出:

class MyEmployee {
    String code;
    String name;
    int age;

    public MyEmployee(String code, String name, int age) {
        super();
        this.code = code;
        this.name = name;
        this.age = age;
    }

    @Override
    public boolean equals(Object obj) {
        if (this == obj)
            return true;
        if (obj == null)
            return false;
        if (getClass() != obj.getClass())
            return false;
        MyEmployee other = (MyEmployee) obj;
        if (code == null) {
            if (other.code != null)
                return false;
        } else if (!code.equals(other.code))
            return false;
        return true;
    }
}

public class Main {
    public static void main(String[] args) {
        MyEmployee employee1 = new MyEmployee("AB12", "Dhruv", 24);
        MyEmployee employee2 = new MyEmployee("AB12", "Dhruv", 24);
        MyEmployee employee3 = employee1;
        System.out.println(employee1.equals(employee3));
        System.out.println("employee1.hashCode(): " + employee1.hashCode());
        System.out.println("employee3.hashCode(): " + employee3.hashCode());
        System.out.println(employee1.equals(employee2));
        System.out.println("employee2.hashCode(): " + employee2.hashCode());
    }
}

输出:

true
employee1.hashCode(): 511833308
employee3.hashCode(): 511833308
true
employee2.hashCode(): 1297685781

由于employee1.equals(employee2)返回true ,哈希码也应该返回相同的(检查点#2上面提到的文档)。 但是, employee1employee2的hashcode 值不同,这是不正确的。 这种差异是因为我们没有覆盖hashCode方法。 因此,每当您覆盖equals ,您还应该以正确的方式覆盖hashCode

最后,下面给出了实现hashCodeequals的正确方法:

class MyEmployee {
    String code;
    String name;
    int age;

    public MyEmployee(String code, String name, int age) {
        super();
        this.code = code;
        this.name = name;
        this.age = age;
    }

    @Override
    public int hashCode() {
        final int prime = 31;
        int result = 1;
        result = prime * result + age;
        result = prime * result + ((code == null) ? 0 : code.hashCode());
        result = prime * result + ((name == null) ? 0 : name.hashCode());
        return result;
    }

    @Override
    public boolean equals(Object obj) {
        if (this == obj)
            return true;
        if (obj == null)
            return false;
        if (getClass() != obj.getClass())
            return false;
        MyEmployee other = (MyEmployee) obj;
        if (age != other.age)
            return false;
        if (code == null) {
            if (other.code != null)
                return false;
        } else if (!code.equals(other.code))
            return false;
        if (name == null) {
            if (other.name != null)
                return false;
        } else if (!name.equals(other.name))
            return false;
        return true;
    }
}

public class Main {
    public static void main(String[] args) {
        MyEmployee employee1 = new MyEmployee("AB12", "Dhruv", 24);
        MyEmployee employee2 = new MyEmployee("AB12", "Dhruv", 24);
        MyEmployee employee3 = employee1;
        System.out.println(employee1.equals(employee3));
        System.out.println("employee1.hashCode(): " + employee1.hashCode());
        System.out.println("employee3.hashCode(): " + employee3.hashCode());
        System.out.println(employee1.equals(employee2));
        System.out.println("employee2.hashCode(): " + employee2.hashCode());
    }
}

输出:

true
employee1.hashCode(): 128107556
employee3.hashCode(): 128107556
true
employee2.hashCode(): 128107556

您需要覆盖equals方法,否则将使用Objectequals方法来比较两个实例。

@Override
public boolean equals(Object that) {
    if (this == that) return true;
    if (that instanceof Elem) {
        Elem thatElem = (Elem) that;
        return thatElem.v == this.v;
    }
    return false;
}

暂无
暂无

声明:本站的技术帖子网页,遵循CC BY-SA 4.0协议,如果您需要转载,请注明本站网址或者原文地址。任何问题请咨询:yoyou2525@163.com.

 
粤ICP备18138465号  © 2020-2024 STACKOOM.COM