![](/img/trans.png)
[英]How to replicate INSERT/UPDATE/DELETE statements using JPA and Hibernate
[英]How to prevent unwanted update statements being executed using Hibernate + JPA
我有 2 个实体空间和类型。 它们都相互关联。 使用这些对象时,当代码执行甚至非常简单的操作时,我会遇到许多不需要的更新语句。
我在下面放了一个简单的场景。 而且,我的应用程序(Spring Boot API)中正在执行一些更复杂的批处理操作。 而且,这个问题导致所有链接的实体都被更新,即使它们没有被修改。
我需要以某种方式摆脱这些不需要的更新,因为它们会导致某些操作出现严重的性能问题。
空间实体(部分显示):
@Entity
@Table(name = "spaces")
@Getter
@Setter
@NoArgsConstructor
public class SpaceDao {
@Id
@GeneratedValue(generator = "uuid")
@GenericGenerator(name = "uuid", strategy = "org.hibernate.id.UUIDGenerator")
private byte[] uuid;
@ManyToOne
@JoinColumn(name = "type_id")
private TypeDao type;
}
类型实体(部分显示):
@Entity
@Table(name = "types")
@Getter
@Setter
@NoArgsConstructor
public class TypeDao {
@Id
@GeneratedValue(strategy = GenerationType.IDENTITY)
private Integer id;
@ManyToOne(fetch = FetchType.LAZY)
@JoinColumn(name="space_id")
private SpaceDao space;
}
Space repo 实现中的 Save 方法:
public Space saveSpace(Space space) {
SpaceDao spaceDao = SpaceMapper.toDao(space);
// Intentionally simplified this logic, to point out that
// I am only reading and saving the object, without any changes.
SpaceDao existingSpaceDao = relationalSpaceRepository.findById(spaceDao.getUuid()).get();
// Following line is where the magic happens
SpaceDao savedSpaceDao = relationalSpaceRepository.save(existingSpaceDao);
return SpaceMapper.toModelObject(savedSpaceDao, true);
}
空间 crud 存储库:
public interface RelationalSpaceRepository extends CrudRepository<SpaceDao, byte[]> { }
代码命中 repository.save() 行时生成的休眠日志:
Hibernate: update spaces set description=?, location=?, name=?, parent_id=?, properties=?, status_id=?, status=?, subtype_id=?, subtype=?, type_id=?, type=? where uuid=?
Hibernate: update spaces set description=?, location=?, name=?, parent_id=?, properties=?, status_id=?, status=?, subtype_id=?, subtype=?, type_id=?, type=? where uuid=?
Hibernate: update types set category=?, definition=?, description=?, disabled=?, logical_order=?, name=?, space_id=? where id=?
Hibernate: update types set category=?, definition=?, description=?, disabled=?, logical_order=?, name=?, space_id=? where id=?
Hibernate: update spaces set description=?, location=?, name=?, parent_id=?, properties=?, status_id=?, status=?, subtype_id=?, subtype=?, type_id=?, type=? where uuid=?
Hibernate: update spaces set description=?, location=?, name=?, parent_id=?, properties=?, status_id=?, status=?, subtype_id=?, subtype=?, type_id=?, type=? where uuid=?
Hibernate: update types set category=?, definition=?, description=?, disabled=?, logical_order=?, name=?, space_id=? where id=?
Hibernate: update spaces set description=?, location=?, name=?, parent_id=?, properties=?, status_id=?, status=?, subtype_id=?, subtype=?, type_id=?, type=? where uuid=?
Hibernate: update types set category=?, definition=?, description=?, disabled=?, logical_order=?, name=?, space_id=? where id=?
Hibernate: update spaces set description=?, location=?, name=?, parent_id=?, properties=?, status_id=?, status=?, subtype_id=?, subtype=?, type_id=?, type=? where uuid=?
找到原因和解决办法。
这是由误报脏检查引起的。 我不确定为什么,但在从数据库中检索实体后,引用类型的属性值会重新实例化,我相信。 导致脏检查将这些实体视为已修改。 因此,下次刷新上下文时,所有“修改过的”实体都将持久保存到数据库中。
作为解决方案,我实现了一个自定义的 Hibernate 拦截器,扩展了 EmptyInterceptor。 并将其注册为hibernate.session_factory.interceptor
。 这样,我就可以进行自定义比较并手动评估脏标志。
拦截器实现:
@Component
public class CustomHibernateInterceptor extends EmptyInterceptor {
private static final long serialVersionUID = -2355165114530619983L;
@Override
public int[] findDirty(Object entity, Serializable id, Object[] currentState, Object[] previousState,
String[] propertyNames, Type[] types) {
if (entity instanceof BaseEntity) {
Set<String> dirtyProperties = new HashSet<>();
for (int i = 0; i < propertyNames.length; i++) {
if (isModified(currentState, previousState, types, i)) {
dirtyProperties.add(propertyNames[i]);
}
}
int[] dirtyPropertiesIndices = new int[dirtyProperties.size()];
List<String> propertyNamesList = Arrays.asList(propertyNames);
int i = 0;
for (String dirtyProperty : dirtyProperties) {
dirtyPropertiesIndices[i++] = propertyNamesList.indexOf(dirtyProperty);
}
return dirtyPropertiesIndices;
}
return super.findDirty(entity, id, currentState, previousState, propertyNames, types);
}
private boolean isModified(Object[] currentState, Object[] previousState, Type[] types, int i) {
boolean equals = true;
Object oldValue = previousState[i];
Object newValue = currentState[i];
if (oldValue != null || newValue != null) {
if (types[i] instanceof AttributeConverterTypeAdapter) {
// check for JSONObject attributes
equals = String.valueOf(oldValue).equals(String.valueOf(newValue));
} else if (types[i] instanceof BinaryType) {
// byte arrays in our entities are always UUID representations
equals = Utilities.byteArrayToUUID((byte[]) oldValue)
.equals(Utilities.byteArrayToUUID((byte[]) newValue));
} else if (!(types[i] instanceof CollectionType)) {
equals = Objects.equals(oldValue, newValue);
}
}
return !equals;
}
}
在配置中注册:
@Configuration
public class XDatabaseConfig {
@Bean(name = "xEntityManagerFactory")
@Primary
public EntityManagerFactory entityManagerFactory() {
HibernateJpaVendorAdapter vendorAdapter = new HibernateJpaVendorAdapter();
CustomHibernateInterceptor interceptor = new CustomHibernateInterceptor();
vendorAdapter.setGenerateDdl(Boolean.FALSE);
vendorAdapter.setShowSql(Boolean.TRUE);
vendorAdapter.setDatabasePlatform("org.hibernate.dialect.MySQL5InnoDBDialect");
LocalContainerEntityManagerFactoryBean factory = new LocalContainerEntityManagerFactoryBean();
factory.setJpaVendorAdapter(vendorAdapter);
factory.setPackagesToScan("com.x.dal.relational.model");
factory.setDataSource(xDataSource());
factory.getJpaPropertyMap().put("hibernate.session_factory.interceptor", interceptor);
factory.afterPropertiesSet();
factory.setLoadTimeWeaver(new InstrumentationLoadTimeWeaver());
return factory.getObject();
}
}
声明:本站的技术帖子网页,遵循CC BY-SA 4.0协议,如果您需要转载,请注明本站网址或者原文地址。任何问题请咨询:yoyou2525@163.com.