[英]Sort the SQL Query in the order of IN
我正在寫一個查詢
SELECT * FROM EMPLOYEES WHERE EMP_ID IN (10,5,3,9,2,8,6)
我希望結果應按以下順序排列
Emp_id Emp_Name
10 John
5 Joe
3 Tippu
9 Rich
2 Chad
8 Chris
6 Rose
基本上與IN子句的順序相同。 有可能嗎? 請告訴我。
PS:我可以在SQL中執行此操作,也可以在獲取結果集后如果我可以使用LINQ或者在前端選項中進行排序選項也適用於我(我在前端有數組中的Emp ID)
謝謝
字符串評論答案; 這將給出與原始答案相同但在字符串上匹配的結果:
string orgList = "John,Joe,Tippu,Rich,Chad,Chris,Rose";
List<string> orderArray = new List<string>(orgList.Split(",".ToCharArray()));
// the linq to do the ordering
var result = ourList.OrderBy(e => {
int loc = orderArray.IndexOf(e.Name);
return loc == -1? int.MaxValue: loc;
});
作為旁注,這兩行可能會更好:
string orgList = "10,5,3,9,2,8,6";
List<int> orderArray = new List<int>(orgList.Split(",".ToCharArray()));
而不是使用整數常量。 使用上面的代碼將按任意逗號分隔的整數列表排序。
Linq中的解決方案給出了以下結果:
void Main()
{
// some test data
List<Person> ourList = new List<Person>()
{
new Person() { ID = 1, Name = "Arron" },
new Person() { ID = 2, Name = "Chad" },
new Person() { ID = 3, Name = "Tippu" },
new Person() { ID = 4, Name = "Hogan" },
new Person() { ID = 5, Name = "Joe" },
new Person() { ID = 6, Name = "Rose" },
new Person() { ID = 7, Name = "Bernard" },
new Person() { ID = 8, Name = "Chris" },
new Person() { ID = 9, Name = "Rich" },
new Person() { ID = 10, Name = "John" }
};
// what we will use to order
List<int> orderArray = new List<int>(){10,5,3,9,2,8,6};
// the linq to do the ordering
var result = ourList.OrderBy(e => {
int loc = orderArray.IndexOf(e.ID);
return loc == -1? int.MaxValue: loc;
});
// good way to test using linqpad (get it at linqpad.com
result.Dump();
}
// test class so we have some thing to order
public class Person
{
public int ID { get; set; }
public string Name { get; set; }
}
原來不好的SQL答案
WITH makeMyOrder
(
SELECT 10 as ID, 1 as Ord
UNION ALL
SELECT 5 as ID, 2 as Ord
UNION ALL
SELECT 3 as ID, 3 as Ord
UNION ALL
SELECT 9 as ID, 4 as Ord
UNION ALL
SELECT 2 as ID, 5 as Ord
UNION ALL
SELECT 8 as ID, 6 as Ord
UNION ALL
SELECT 6 as ID, 7 as Ord
),
SELECT *
FROM EMPLOYEES E
JOIN makeMyOrder O ON E.EMP_ID = O.ID
ORDER BY O.Ord
什么,Linq-To-SQL沒有魔術按鈕你可以按它來做到這一點? :-)
要在SQL Server中執行此操作,您需要一個將列表轉換為集合並維護訂單的函數。 這種貓的皮膚有很多種方法; 這是一個:
CREATE FUNCTION dbo.SplitInts_Ordered
(
@List VARCHAR(MAX),
@Delimiter VARCHAR(255)
)
RETURNS TABLE
AS
RETURN (SELECT [Index] = ROW_NUMBER() OVER (ORDER BY Number), Item
FROM (SELECT Number, Item = CONVERT(INT, SUBSTRING(@List, Number,
CHARINDEX(@Delimiter, @List + @Delimiter, Number) - Number))
FROM (SELECT ROW_NUMBER() OVER (ORDER BY [object_id])
FROM sys.all_objects) AS n(Number)
WHERE Number <= CONVERT(INT, LEN(@List))
AND SUBSTRING(@Delimiter + @List, Number, LEN(@Delimiter)) = @Delimiter
) AS y);
GO
現在你可以說:
DECLARE @list VARCHAR(MAX);
SET @list = '10,5,3,9,2,8,6';
SELECT e.Emp_Id, e.Emp_Name -- never use * in production code
FROM dbo.Employees AS e -- always use schema prefix
INNER JOIN dbo.SplitInts_Ordered(@list, ',') AS x
ON x.Item = e.Emp_Id
ORDER BY x.[Index];
一個更多,更多,更好,更好的方法是停止傳遞逗號分隔列表,並使用表值參數。 這是一組東西,不是字符串或一些JSON淫穢。 在C#代碼中創建一個DataTable,包含兩列,列表和順序。 然后創建一個表類型:
CREATE TYPE dbo.SortedList AS TABLE(ID INT, [Order] INT);
然后是一個以此為參數的存儲過程:
CREATE PROCEDURE dbo.GetTheList
@x dbo.SortedList READONLY
AS
BEGIN
SET NOCOUNT ON;
SELECT e.Emp_Id, e.Emp_Name
FROM dbo.Employees AS e
INNER JOIN @x AS x
ON x.ID = e.Emp_Id
ORDER BY x.[Order];
END
GO
你是否可以用Linq-To-SQL做到這一點,我不確定; 人們似乎很快就跳上了Linq的潮流,因為它讓事情變得如此簡單。 好吧,只要你不需要實際做任何事情。
聲明:本站的技術帖子網頁,遵循CC BY-SA 4.0協議,如果您需要轉載,請注明本站網址或者原文地址。任何問題請咨詢:yoyou2525@163.com.