簡體   English   中英

為什么在scalaz中沒有TrieMap的Semigroup實例

[英]Why there is no Semigroup instance for TrieMap in scalaz

雖然我可以做

Map("a" -> 1) |+| Map("a" -> 2)

似乎不支持

TrieMap("a" -> 1) |+| TrieMap("a" -> 2)

為什么呢

Scalaz並未提供形成Scalaz所有可能的Type + Operation組合,但是您可以輕松實現它,例如,使用以下implicit

import scala.collection.concurrent.TrieMap
import scalaz._, Scalaz._

implicit def trieMapSemigroup[K: BuildKeyConstraint, V: Semigroup]: Semigroup[TrieMap[K, V]] =
  new Semigroup[TrieMap[K, V]] {
    def append(m1: TrieMap[K, V], m2: => TrieMap[K, V]) =
      (m1 /: m2) { case (res, (k, v)) =>
        res += (k -> res.get(k).cata(Semigroup[V].append(_, v), v))
      }
  }

這給了您預期的效果:

scala> TrieMap("a" -> 1) |+| TrieMap("a" -> 2)
res: TrieMap(a -> 3)

當然,這對於在scalaz定義的半組中的每個值都scalaz


那Monoid呢?

如果您還希望implicit優化版本也可以用作Monoid:

  implicit def trieMapMonoid[K: BuildKeyConstraint, V: Semigroup]: Monoid[TrieMap[K, V]] = new Monoid[TrieMap[K, V]] {
    def zero = TrieMap.empty[K, V]

    def append(m1: TrieMap[K, V], m2: => TrieMap[K, V]) = {
      val m2Instance: TrieMap[K, V] = m2
      val (from, to, semigroup) = {
        if (m1.size > m2Instance.size) (m2Instance, m1, Semigroup[V].append(_: V, _: V))
        else (m1, m2Instance, (Semigroup[V].append(_: V, _: V)).flip)
      }
      from.foldLeft(to) {
        case (res, (k, v)) => res += (k -> res.get(k).map(semigroup(_, v)).getOrElse(v))
      }
    }
  }

(從scalaz/std/Map.scala改編的無恥代碼)

暫無
暫無

聲明:本站的技術帖子網頁,遵循CC BY-SA 4.0協議,如果您需要轉載,請注明本站網址或者原文地址。任何問題請咨詢:yoyou2525@163.com.

 
粵ICP備18138465號  © 2020-2024 STACKOOM.COM