[英]Interface implementation propagation in Java generics
我有以下代碼(經過簡化,以顯示問題的核心):
public interface IElement {}
public interface IDataSet<E extends IElement> {}
public interface IPropertyTranslator<D extends IDataSet<? super E>, E extends IElement> {}
public interface IElementTranslator<D extends IDataSet<?>> {}
public class AnimalElement implements IElement {}
public class AnimalDataSet implements IDataSet<AnimalElement> {}
public class AnimalPropertyTranslator implements IPropertyTranslator<AnimalDataSet, AnimalElement> {}
public class UniversalPropertyTranslator implements IPropertyTranslator<IDataSet<IElement>, IElement> {}
public class ElementTranslator<D extends IDataSet<? super E>, E extends IElement> implements IElementTranslator<D> {
public Collection<IPropertyTranslator<? super D, ? super E>> propertyTranslators = new HashSet<>();
}
public class Demo {
public static void demo() {
ElementTranslator<AnimalDataSet, AnimalElement> animalElementTranslator = new ElementTranslator<>();
animalElementTranslator.propertyTranslators.add(new AnimalPropertyTranslator());
animalElementTranslator.propertyTranslators.add(new UniversalPropertyTranslator());
}
}
不幸的是,demo方法的最后一行會產生以下錯誤: The method add(IPropertyTranslator<? super AnimalDataSet,? super AnimalElement>) in the type Collection<IPropertyTranslator<? super AnimalDataSet,? super AnimalElement>> is not applicable for the arguments (UniversalPropertyTranslator)
The method add(IPropertyTranslator<? super AnimalDataSet,? super AnimalElement>) in the type Collection<IPropertyTranslator<? super AnimalDataSet,? super AnimalElement>> is not applicable for the arguments (UniversalPropertyTranslator)
The method add(IPropertyTranslator<? super AnimalDataSet,? super AnimalElement>) in the type Collection<IPropertyTranslator<? super AnimalDataSet,? super AnimalElement>> is not applicable for the arguments (UniversalPropertyTranslator)
。 通過隨機試驗,我發現問題可能與<D extends IDataSet<? super E>, E extends IElement>
<D extends IDataSet<? super E>, E extends IElement>
表達式,盡管我仍然不知道如何解決它。
同時,以下代碼變體可以完美運行:
public interface IDataSet {}
public interface IPropertyTranslator<D extends IDataSet> {}
public interface IElementTranslator<D extends IDataSet> {}
public class AnimalDataSet implements IDataSet {}
public class AnimalPropertyTranslator implements IPropertyTranslator<AnimalDataSet> {}
public class UniversalPropertyTranslator implements IPropertyTranslator<IDataSet> {}
public class ElementTranslator<D extends IDataSet> implements IElementTranslator<D> {
public Collection<IPropertyTranslator<? super D>> propertyTranslators = new HashSet<>();
}
public class Demo {
public static void demo() {
ElementTranslator<AnimalDataSet> animalElementTranslator = new ElementTranslator<>();
animalElementTranslator.propertyTranslators.add(new AnimalPropertyTranslator());
animalElementTranslator.propertyTranslators.add(new UniversalPropertyTranslator());
}
}
我不明白為什么接口的第二個通用部分會導致代碼的行為有所不同。
該解決方案與“生產者擴展,超級消費者”規則略有相關。 在問題代碼中,需要將以下標頭更改為以下標頭:
public interface IPropertyTranslator<D extends IDataSet<? extends E>, E extends IElement> {}
public class UniversalPropertyTranslator implements IPropertyTranslator<IDataSet<? extends IElement>, IElement> {}
而且一切都會正常進行。
聲明:本站的技術帖子網頁,遵循CC BY-SA 4.0協議,如果您需要轉載,請注明本站網址或者原文地址。任何問題請咨詢:yoyou2525@163.com.