[英]c# Weird Method Inlining Behavior
在反編譯我編寫的代碼時,我注意到一個奇怪的內聯行為。
我注意到一個方法不會被內聯,除非它在一個循環中。
奇怪的是,以非泛型方式編寫的這個方法的等價物總是被內聯。
代碼:
using System;
using System.Runtime.CompilerServices;
using SharpLab.Runtime;
[JitGeneric(typeof(int))]
public static class GenericOps<T> where T : unmanaged
{
[MethodImpl(MethodImplOptions.AggressiveInlining)]
public static bool Less(T left, T right)
{
if (typeof(T) == typeof(byte)) return (byte)(object)left < (byte)(object)right;
if (typeof(T) == typeof(sbyte)) return (sbyte)(object)left < (sbyte)(object)right;
if (typeof(T) == typeof(ushort)) return (ushort)(object)left < (ushort)(object)right;
if (typeof(T) == typeof(short)) return (short)(object)left < (short)(object)right;
if (typeof(T) == typeof(uint)) return (uint)(object)left < (uint)(object)right;
if (typeof(T) == typeof(int)) return (int)(object)left < (int)(object)right;
if (typeof(T) == typeof(ulong)) return (ulong)(object)left < (ulong)(object)right;
if (typeof(T) == typeof(long)) return (long)(object)left < (long)(object)right;
if (typeof(T) == typeof(float)) return (float)(object)left < (float)(object)right;
if (typeof(T) == typeof(double)) return (double)(object)left < (double)(object)right;
throw new NotSupportedException(typeof(T).Name);
}
public static T Min(T left, T right)
{
return Less(left, right) ? left : right;
}
}
public static class IntOps
{
public static bool Less(int left, int right)
{
return left < right;
}
public static int Min(int left, int right)
{
return Less(left, right) ? left : right;
}
}
[JitGeneric(typeof(int))]
public static class C<T> where T : unmanaged
{
public static T M2(T a, T b)
{
return GenericOps<T>.Min(a, b);
}
public static T M2Loop(Span<T> a, Span<T> b)
{
T num = default;
for(int i = 0; i < a.Length; i++)
{
num = GenericOps<T>.Min(a[i], b[i]);
}
return num;
}
}
我注意到的奇怪行為:
GenericOps.Min()
內部, GenericOps.Less()
不是內聯的,與IntOps.Min()
相反,其中IntOps.Less()
是內聯的。C.M2()
中, GenericOps<T>.Min
內聯,與C.M2Loop C.M2Loop
,其中GenericOps<T>.Min
是內聯的。 在X64
平台上使用 SharpLab 進行反編譯, Core CLR v4.700.20.41105 on amd64
反編譯的 JIT:
Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.EmbeddedAttribute..ctor()
L0000: ret
System.Runtime.CompilerServices.IsUnmanagedAttribute..ctor()
L0000: ret
GenericOps`1[[System.Int32, System.Private.CoreLib]].Less(Int32, Int32)
L0000: cmp ecx, edx
L0002: setl al
L0005: movzx eax, al
L0008: ret
GenericOps`1[[System.Int32, System.Private.CoreLib]].Min(Int32, Int32)
L0000: push rdi
L0001: push rsi
L0002: sub rsp, 0x28
L0006: mov esi, ecx
L0008: mov edi, edx
L000a: mov ecx, esi
L000c: mov edx, edi
L000e: call GenericOps`1[[System.Int32, System.Private.CoreLib]].Less(Int32, Int32)
L0013: test eax, eax
L0015: jne short L0020
L0017: mov eax, edi
L0019: add rsp, 0x28
L001d: pop rsi
L001e: pop rdi
L001f: ret
L0020: mov eax, esi
L0022: add rsp, 0x28
L0026: pop rsi
L0027: pop rdi
L0028: ret
IntOps.Less(Int32, Int32)
L0000: cmp ecx, edx
L0002: setl al
L0005: movzx eax, al
L0008: ret
IntOps.Min(Int32, Int32)
L0000: cmp ecx, edx
L0002: jl short L0007
L0004: mov eax, edx
L0006: ret
L0007: mov eax, ecx
L0009: ret
C`1[[System.Int32, System.Private.CoreLib]].M2(Int32, Int32)
L0000: push rdi
L0001: push rsi
L0002: sub rsp, 0x28
L0006: mov esi, ecx
L0008: mov edi, edx
L000a: mov ecx, esi
L000c: mov edx, edi
L000e: call GenericOps`1[[System.Int32, System.Private.CoreLib]].Less(Int32, Int32)
L0013: test eax, eax
L0015: jne short L001b
L0017: mov eax, edi
L0019: jmp short L001d
L001b: mov eax, esi
L001d: add rsp, 0x28
L0021: pop rsi
L0022: pop rdi
L0023: ret
C`1[[System.Int32, System.Private.CoreLib]].M2Loop(System.Span`1<Int32>, System.Span`1<Int32>)
L0000: push rsi
L0001: sub rsp, 0x20
L0005: mov r8, [rcx]
L0008: mov ecx, [rcx+8]
L000b: xor eax, eax
L000d: xor r9d, r9d
L0010: test ecx, ecx
L0012: jle short L0046
L0014: mov r10d, [rdx+8]
L0018: mov rdx, [rdx]
L001b: movsxd rax, r9d
L001e: mov r11d, [r8+rax*4]
L0022: cmp r9d, r10d
L0025: jae short L004c
L0027: mov eax, [rdx+rax*4]
L002a: cmp r11d, eax
L002d: setl sil
L0031: movzx esi, sil
L0035: test esi, esi
L0037: jne short L003b
L0039: jmp short L003e
L003b: mov eax, r11d
L003e: inc r9d
L0041: cmp r9d, ecx
L0044: jl short L001b
L0046: add rsp, 0x20
L004a: pop rsi
L004b: ret
L004c: call 0x00007ffbf05bfc60
L0051: int3
任何人都可以為這種奇怪的行為提供解釋嗎?
有沒有辦法保證GenericOps.Less()
和GenericOps.Min()
總是內聯?
你的第一點很容易解釋。 throw
語句防止內聯。 請參閱 .net 源代碼,了解他們如何使用ThrowHelper
class 將拋出異常移出主要方法主體。將 throw 語句移至其他方法以增加內聯的機會。 沒有什么能保證它。
至於另一點,我猜測 jit 決定調用開銷將足夠大,以至於循環體內的內聯將超過抵消增加的代碼大小。
聲明:本站的技術帖子網頁,遵循CC BY-SA 4.0協議,如果您需要轉載,請注明本站網址或者原文地址。任何問題請咨詢:yoyou2525@163.com.