[英]How can I make this repeated code more elegant?
我在下面有這個重復的代碼,我假設可以將其合並,但是如果您注意到每個詞典都是不同的通用詞典:
dictionary1是類型
Dictionary<int, ContinuousIntegrationSolution>
而dictionary2的類型為:
Dictionary<int, BugTracker>
DataTable dt = GetDataTable("CI");
for (int i = 0; i < dt.Rows.Count; i++)
{
DataRow dr = dt.Rows[i];
int id = Convert.ToInt32(dr["id"]);
string name = dr["name"].ToString();
_dictionary1[id] = new ContinuousIntegrationSolution(){Name = name};
}
DataTable dt1 = GetDataTable("Bug_Tracking");
for (int i = 0; i < dt1.Rows.Count; i++)
{
DataRow dr = dt1.Rows[i];
int id = Convert.ToInt32(dr["id"]);
string name = dr["name"].ToString();
_dictionary2[id] = new BugTracker() { Name = name };
}
DataTable dt2 = GetDataTable("SDLC");
for (int i = 0; i < dt2.Rows.Count; i++)
{
DataRow dr = dt2.Rows[i];
int id = Convert.ToInt32(dr["id"]);
string name = dr["name"].ToString();
_dictionary3[id] = new SDLCProcess() { Name = name };
}
注意:我已修復下面提到的一些錯字。
public interface INameable
{
string Name {get;set;}
}
public static IDictionary<int, T> ReadTable<T>(string tableName)
where T : INameable, new()
{
DataTable dt = GetDataTable(tableName);
var dictionary = new Dictionary<int, T>();
for (int i = 0; i < dt.Rows.Count; i++)
{
DataRow dr = dt.Rows[i];
int id = Convert.ToInt32(dr["id"]);
string name = dr["name"].ToString();
dictionary[id] = new T() { Name = name };
}
return dictionary;
}
如果您具有動態的c#4.0,則可以避免INameable導致類型安全性的(部分)損失
一個與Hakon的答案相似但在不暴露字典的情況下是
public IDictionary<int,T> ReadTable<T>(
string tableName, Action<T, string> onName)
where T : new()
{
var dictionary = new Dictionary<int,T>();
DataTable table = GetDataTable(tableName);
foreach (DataRow row in table.Rows)
{
int id = Convert.ToInt32(row["id"]);
string name = row["name"].ToString();
var t = new T();
onName(t, name);
dictionary[id] = t;
}
return dictionary;
}
然后像這樣消耗:
var ci = ReadTable<ContinuousIntegrationSolution>("CI",
(t, name) => t.Name = name);
var bt = ReadTable<BugTracker >("Bug_Tracking",
(t, name) => t.Name = name);
var sdlc = ReadTable<SDLCProcess>("SDLC",
(t, name) => t.Name = name);
一種替代的,更靈活的方法,但是由於類型推斷,在調用站點上使用起來仍然相當簡單:
public IDictionary<int,T> ReadTable<T>(string tableName, Func<string,T> create)
{
DataTable table = GetDataTable(tableName);
var dictionary = new Dictionary<int,T>()
foreach (DataRow row in table.Rows)
{
int id = Convert.ToInt32(row["id"]);
string name = row["name"].ToString();
dictionary[id] = create(name);
}
return dictionary;
}
然后像這樣消耗:
var ci = ReadTable("CI",
name => new ContinuousIntegrationSolution() {Name = name});
var bt = ReadTable("Bug_Tracking",
name => new BugTracker() {Name = name});
var sdlc = ReadTable("SDLC",
name => new SDLCProcess() {Name = name});
如果您要使用lambda方法,建議您使用后者。
我不會使用建議的接口,而是使用lambda函數執行類似於以下的分配:
public void ReadTable(string tableName, Action<int, string> _setNameAction) {
DataTable table = GetDataTable(tableName);
foreach (DataRow row in table.Rows) {
int id = Convert.ToInt32(row["id"]);
string name = row["name"].ToString();
_setNameAction(id, name);
}
}
並調用如下方法:
ReadTable("CI", (id, name)
=> _dictionary1[id] = new ContinuousIntegrationSolution{Name = name});
ReadTable("Bug_Tracking", (id, name)
=> _dictionary2[id] = new BugTracker { Name = name });
ReadTable("SDLC", (id, name)
=> _dictionary3[id] = new SDLCProcess { Name = name });
將其放在帶有工廠方法的函數中以實例化id對象。 像這樣
public delegate T CreateObjectDelegate<T>(string name);
public static void ProcessDataTable<T>(DataTable dt, Dictionary<int, T> dictionary, CreateObjectDelegate<T> createObj)
{
for (int i = 0; i < dt.Rows.Count; i++)
{
DataRow dr = dt.Rows[i];
int id = Convert.ToInt32(dr["id"]);
string name = dr["name"].ToString();
dictionary[id] = createObj(name);
}
}
static void Main(string[] args)
{
var dt = new DataTable();
var dictionary = new Dictionary<int, BugTracker>();
ProcessDataTable<BugTracker>(dt, dictionary, (name) => { return new BugTracker() { Name = name }; });
}
聲明:本站的技術帖子網頁,遵循CC BY-SA 4.0協議,如果您需要轉載,請注明本站網址或者原文地址。任何問題請咨詢:yoyou2525@163.com.