簡體   English   中英

數據框子集性能

[英]Data Frame Subset Performance

我有幾個大型數據框(100萬+行x 6-10列),需要重復子集化。 子設置部分是我代碼中最慢的部分,我想知道是否有辦法更快地做到這一點。

load("https://dl.dropbox.com/u/4131944/Temp/DF_IOSTAT_ALL.rda")
start_in <- strptime("2012-08-20 13:00", "%Y-%m-%d %H:%M")
end_in<- strptime("2012-08-20 17:00", "%Y-%m-%d %H:%M")
system.time(DF_IOSTAT_INT <- DF_IOSTAT_ALL[DF_IOSTAT_ALL$date_stamp >= start_in & DF_IOSTAT_ALL$date_stamp <= end_in,])

> system.time(DF_IOSTAT_INT <- DF_IOSTAT_ALL[DF_IOSTAT_ALL$date_stamp >= start_in & DF_IOSTAT_ALL$date_stamp <= end_in,])
   user  system elapsed 
  16.59    0.00   16.60 

dput(head(DF_IOSTAT_ALL))
structure(list(date_stamp = structure(list(sec = c(14, 24, 34, 
44, 54, 4), min = c(0L, 0L, 0L, 0L, 0L, 1L), hour = c(0L, 0L, 
0L, 0L, 0L, 0L), mday = c(20L, 20L, 20L, 20L, 20L, 20L), mon = c(7L, 
7L, 7L, 7L, 7L, 7L), year = c(112L, 112L, 112L, 112L, 112L, 112L
), wday = c(1L, 1L, 1L, 1L, 1L, 1L), yday = c(232L, 232L, 232L, 
232L, 232L, 232L), isdst = c(1L, 1L, 1L, 1L, 1L, 1L)), .Names = c("sec", 
"min", "hour", "mday", "mon", "year", "wday", "yday", "isdst"
), class = c("POSIXlt", "POSIXt")), cpu = c(0.9, 0.2, 0.2, 0.1, 
0.2, 0.1), rsec_s = c(0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0), wsec_s = c(0, 3.8, 0, 
0.4, 0.2, 0.2), util_pct = c(0, 0.1, 0, 0, 0, 0), node = c("bda101", 
"bda101", "bda101", "bda101", "bda101", "bda101")), .Names = c("date_stamp", 
"cpu", "rsec_s", "wsec_s", "util_pct", "node"), row.names = c(NA, 
6L), class = "data.frame")

我會為此使用xts。 唯一可能出現的問題是xts是具有有序索引屬性的矩陣,因此您不能像在data.frame中那樣混合類型。

如果節點列是不變的,則可以將其從xts對象中排除:

library(xts)
x <- xts(DF_IOSTAT_ALL[,2:5], as.POSIXct(DF_IOSTAT_ALL$date_stamp))
x["2012-08-20 00:00:24/2012-08-20 00:00:54"]

使用OP的實際數據進行更新:

Data <- DF_IOSTAT_ALL
# change node from character to numeric,
# so it can exist in the xts object too.
Data$node <- as.numeric(gsub("^bda","",Data$node)
# create the xts object
x <- xts(Data[,-1], as.POSIXct(Data$date_stamp))
# subset one day
system.time(x['2012-08-20 13:00/2012-08-20 17:00'])
#    user  system elapsed 
#       0       0       0
# subset 13:00-17:00 for all days
system.time(x['T13:00/T17:00'])
#    user  system elapsed 
#    2.64    0.00    2.66

這是我對data.table實驗。 有趣的是,僅轉換為data.table可以使查找速度更快,這可能是通過對邏輯向量的更有效查找。 我比較了四件事:原始數據幀查找; 從POSIXlt轉換為POSIXct的查找(感謝Matthew Dowle); 數據表查找; 以及復制和轉換設置之外的數據表查找。 即使進行了其他設置,數據表查找仍會獲勝。 通過多次查找,您將節省更多時間。

library(data.table)
library(rbenchmark)
load("DF_IOSTAT_ALL.rda")
DF_IOSTAT_ALL.original <- DF_IOSTAT_ALL

start_in <- strptime("2012-08-20 13:00", "%Y-%m-%d %H:%M")
end_in<- strptime("2012-08-20 17:00", "%Y-%m-%d %H:%M")
#function to test: original
fun <- function() DF_IOSTAT_INT <<- DF_IOSTAT_ALL.original[DF_IOSTAT_ALL.original$date_stamp >= start_in & DF_IOSTAT_ALL.original$date_stamp <= end_in,]
#function to test: changing to POSIXct
DF_IOSTAT_ALL.ct <- within(DF_IOSTAT_ALL.original,date_stamp <- as.POSIXct(date_stamp))
fun.ct <- function() DF_IOSTAT_INT <<- DF_IOSTAT_ALL.ct[with(DF_IOSTAT_ALL.ct,date_stamp >= start_in & date_stamp <= end_in),]
#function to test: with data.table and POSIXct
DF_IOSTAT_ALL.dt <- as.data.table(DF_IOSTAT_ALL.ct);
fun.dt <- function() DF_IOSTAT_INT <<- DF_IOSTAT_ALL.dt[date_stamp >= start_in & date_stamp <= end_in,]
#function to test: with data table and POSIXct, with setup steps
newfun <- function() {
    DF_IOSTAT_ALL <- DF_IOSTAT_ALL.original;
    #data.table doesn't play well with POSIXlt, so convert to POSIXct
    DF_IOSTAT_ALL$date_stamp <- as.POSIXct(DF_IOSTAT_ALL$date_stamp);
    DF_IOSTAT_ALL <- data.table(DF_IOSTAT_ALL);
    DF_IOSTAT_INT <<- DF_IOSTAT_ALL[date_stamp >= start_in & date_stamp <= end_in,];
}
benchmark(fun(), fun.ct(), fun.dt(), newfun(), replications=3,order="relative")

#      test replications elapsed   relative user.self sys.self user.child sys.child
#3 fun.dt()            3    0.18   1.000000      0.11     0.08         NA        NA
#2 fun.ct()            3    0.52   2.888889      0.44     0.08         NA        NA
#4 newfun()            3   35.49 197.166667     34.88     0.58         NA        NA
#1    fun()            3   66.68 370.444444     66.42     0.15         NA        NA

如果您事先知道您的時間間隔,則可以通過使用findInterval進行拆分或對表進行cut和鍵控/索引來使其速度更快。

DF_IOSTAT_ALL <- copy(DF_IOSTAT_ALL.new)
time.breaks <- strptime.d("2012-08-19 19:00:00") + 0:178 * 60 * 60 #by hour
DF_IOSTAT_ALL[,interval := findInterval(date_stamp,time.breaks)]
setkey(DF_IOSTAT_ALL,interval)

start_in <- time.breaks[60]
end_in <- time.breaks[61]
benchmark(a <- DF_IOSTAT_ALL[J(60)],b <- fun2(DF_IOSTAT_ALL))
#                  test replications elapsed relative user.self sys.self user.child sys.child
#1 DF_IOSTAT_ALL[J(60)]          100    0.78 1.000000      0.64     0.14         NA        NA
#2  fun2(DF_IOSTAT_ALL)          100    6.69 8.576923      5.76     0.91         NA        NA
all.equal(a,b[,.SD,.SDcols=c(12,1:11,13)]) #test for equality (rearranging columns to match)
#TRUE

暫無
暫無

聲明:本站的技術帖子網頁,遵循CC BY-SA 4.0協議,如果您需要轉載,請注明本站網址或者原文地址。任何問題請咨詢:yoyou2525@163.com.

 
粵ICP備18138465號  © 2020-2024 STACKOOM.COM