[英]alternative to std::this_thread::sleep_for()
I have a loop and I want to ensure that it runs for an (approximately) fixed amount of time for each loop. 我有一个循环,我想确保它在每个循环中(大约)固定的时间运行。
I am using sleep_for
to achieve this behavior but I also want the program to be able to compile on environments that do not include full support of the standard thread library. 我正在使用sleep_for
来实现此行为,但我也希望该程序能够在不完全支持标准线程库的环境下进行编译。 Right now I have something like this: 现在我有这样的事情:
using namespace std;
using namespace std::chrono;
//
while( !quit )
{
steady_clock::time_point then = steady_clock::now();
//...do loop stuff
steady_clock::time_point now = steady_clock::now();
#ifdef NOTHREADS
// version for systems without thread support
while( duration_cast< microseconds >( now - then ).count() < 10000 )
{
now = steady_clock::now();
}
#else
this_thread::sleep_for( microseconds{ 10000 - duration_cast<microseconds>( now - then ).count() } );
#endif
}
While this allows the program to compile in environments that do not support standard threads, it is also very CPU-intensive as the program checks continually for the time condition rather than waiting until it is true. 尽管这使程序可以在不支持标准线程的环境中进行编译,但它也非常占用CPU资源,因为程序会不断检查时间条件,而不是等到它成立为止。
My question is: Is there a less resource-intensive way to enable this "wait" behavior using only standard C++ (ie not boost) in an environment that does not fully support threads? 我的问题是:在不完全支持线程的环境中,是否有一种资源占用较少的方法仅使用标准C ++(即不增强)来启用这种“等待”行为?
There are many time based functions, it very much depends on the Operating system you're using. 有许多基于时间的功能,这在很大程度上取决于您所使用的操作系统。
Microsoft API offers Sleep() (capital S) which gives you a millisecond sleep. Microsoft API提供了Sleep()(大写S),可为您提供毫秒级的睡眠。
Under Unix (POSIX) you have nanosleep(). 在Unix(POSIX)下,您具有nanosleep()。
I think that these two functions should get you running on most computers. 我认为这两个功能应该可以使您在大多数计算机上运行。
The implementation would be to use the same loop, but sleep a little inside the while() loop. 实现将使用相同的循环,但在while()循环中要多睡一会。 That will still be a pool like thing, but
faster
much less CPU intensive. 那将仍然是一个类似池的事情,但是
速度更快
,CPU占用更少。
Also, as nm mentioned, select() has that capability. 同样,如nm所提到的,select()具有该功能。 Just a bit more convoluted to implement, but it is expected to return once the time elapsed. 实施起来有些复杂,但是随着时间的流逝,它有望返回。
声明:本站的技术帖子网页,遵循CC BY-SA 4.0协议,如果您需要转载,请注明本站网址或者原文地址。任何问题请咨询:yoyou2525@163.com.