自然数和有效简单类型的lambda演算术语之间的映射是什么？

Question

Is there any efficient algorithm that maps between well-typed, closed terms of the simply typed lambda calculus and natural numbers? For example, using bruijn indexes (and probably on incorrect order):

0 → (λ 0)
1 → (λ (λ (0 1)))
2 → (λ (λ (1 0)))
3 → (λ 0 (λ 0))
4 → (λ (λ 0) 0)
5 → (λ (λ 1) 0)
6 → ... so on

Related questions: is there an algorithm that maps between natural numbers and normalized terms of the simply typed lambda calculus? Also, the same questions applied to the untyped lambda calculus.

Answer 1

The Binary Lambda Calculus defines a binary encoding for any closed term in the untyped lambda calculus, and also suggests a bijection between natural numbers and binary strings, but the former is not surjective. Still, the paper http://arxiv.org/abs/1401.0379 "Counting Terms in the Binary Lambda Calculus" might yield efficient ranking/unranking mappings.

Answer 2

Due to the highly context-sensitive nature of typed lambda calculus I would be surprised if there were an efficient algorithm, or rather a "natural" efficient algorithm.

This paper has nice formulae for counting untyped lambda terms and from that they derive a fairly simple function for enumerating untyped terms. They also provide a counting function for normal forms which should be easy to adapt to a generating function too. Unfortunately, they only make a typed generator function by filtering that which is absurdly expensive (one of the results of the paper is just how absurd it is).

As for a more efficient way to generate typed terms, my advice would be to generate typing derivations instead of terms and then type checking them.