简体   繁体   English

BitSet无法用于Integer.MAX_VALUE和Integer.MIN_VALUE

[英]BitSet is not working for Integer.MAX_VALUE and Integer.MIN_VALUE

I tried to use BitSet(java) to find the common numbers in two arrays. 我试图使用BitSet(java)在两个数组中查找公用数字。 (It seems works very well on finding repeating chars), however, when I tried the corner case such as Integer.MAX_VALUE (it cannot show up in the res) and Integer.MIN_VALUE( it shows IndexOutOfBoundsException("bitIndex < 0: " + bitIndex)) I thought the BitSet size is auto expandable. (在查找重复的字符时看起来效果很好),但是,当我尝试使用Integer.MAX_VALUE(无法在res中显示)和Integer.MIN_VALUE(它显示IndexOutOfBoundsException(“ bitIndex <0:” + bitIndex))我认为BitSet的大小可以自动扩展。 Anyone can figure it out? 任何人都可以弄清楚吗? Thanks. 谢谢。 BitSet is so handy. BitSet非常方便。 :) :)

public static List<Integer> common(List<Integer> A, List<Integer> B) {
    List<Integer> res = new ArrayList<Integer>();
    BitSet bitSetA = new BitSet();
    BitSet bitSetB = new BitSet();
    for (Integer x : A) {
      bitSetA.set(x);
    }
    for (Integer x : B) {
      bitSetB.set(x);
    }
    bitSetA.and(bitSetB);
    for (int i = 0; i < bitSetA.size(); i++) {
      if (bitSetA.get(i)) {
          res.add(i);
      }
    }
    return res;
}

public static void main(String[] args) {
    List<Integer> A = new ArrayList<Integer>();
    A.add(1);A.add(2);A.add(Integer.MIN_VALUE);
    List<Integer> B = new ArrayList<Integer>();
    B.add(Integer.MIN_VALUE);B.add(4);B.add(4);
    List<Integer> res = new ArrayList<Integer>();
    res = common(A,B);
    System.out.println(res);
}

} }

BitSet indexes must not be negative; BitSet索引不得为负。 see the third sentence of the javadoc . 参见javadoc的第三句。 Integer.MIN_VALUE is negative and thus is not a valid index. Integer.MIN_VALUE为负,因此不是有效的索引。

Integer.MAX_VALUE works for me, as long as: 只要满足以下条件,即可使用Integer.MAX_VALUE

  • there is sufficient heap space available, which is not the case by default in a 32-bit JVM, at least not the Oracle 32-bit JVMs I have conveniently to hand. 有足够的可用堆空间,默认情况下,在32位JVM中不是这样,至少我方便使用的Oracle 32位JVM并非如此。 A little experiment finds -Xmx of about 400m per maximal BitSet is enough. 一个小实验发现,每个最大BitSet大约400m的-Xmx就足够了。 (I'd bet the actual usage is 256m, but -Xmx is a crude tool that includes several heap spaces and some overhead.) (我敢打赌,实际使用量为256m,但-Xmx是粗略的工具,其中包含多个堆空间和一些开销。)

  • you don't use length() or size() (or toString() ) which malfunction at the maximal size. 您不要使用以最大大小发生故障的length()size() (或toString() )。 If I loop naively (as your code does) up to Integer.MAX_VALUE it works but takes about a minute; 如果我天真地循环(如您的代码那样)直到Integer.MAX_VALUE它就可以工作,但是大约需要一分钟; the nextSetBit approach shown in the javadoc is hugely faster. javadoc中显示的nextSetBit方法要快得多。

声明:本站的技术帖子网页,遵循CC BY-SA 4.0协议,如果您需要转载,请注明本站网址或者原文地址。任何问题请咨询:yoyou2525@163.com.

 
粤ICP备18138465号  © 2020-2024 STACKOOM.COM