[英]swift class as parameter without .self
I've wrote some functions (Swift 2.1, XCode 7.1.1): 我写了一些函数(Swift 2.1,XCode 7.1.1):
public func test1<T:UIView>(type: T.Type) -> T {
print(type.dynamicType)
return type.init()
}
public func test2<T:UIView>(type: T.Type)(_ n: Int) -> T {
print(type.dynamicType)
return type.init()
}
public func test3<T1:UIView, T2:UIView>(type1: T1.Type, _ type2: T2.Type) {
print(type1.init())
print(type2.init())
}
public func test4<T:UIView>(type: T.Type, _ n: Int) {
print(type.init())
print(n)
}
public func test5<T:UIView>(n: Int,_ type: T.Type) {
print(type.init())
print(n)
}
And call them with: 并打电话给他们:
test1(UIButton)
test1(UIButton.self)
test2(UIButton)(1)
test2(UIButton.self)(1)
test3(UIButton.self, UITextField.self)
test4(UIButton.self, 1)
test5(1, UIButton.self)
As you can see, when a type is the only parameter, it can omit the ".self". 如您所见,当一个类型是唯一的参数时,它可以省略“.self”。 But for all functions that not have only a type parameter, they require the ".self".
但对于所有不具有类型参数的函数,它们都需要“.self”。
I want to know: 我想知道:
Coincidentally, this just came up on swift-evolution. 巧合的是,这恰好出现在迅速演变中。 The ability to omit
.self
when the Type is the only argument, has been reported as a bug in Swift. 当Type是唯一的参数时,省略
.self
的能力已被报告为Swift中的错误 。
The relevant quote from Apple: Apple的相关报价:
It's a bug.
这是一个错误。
.self
is supposed to be required everywhere..self
都应该要求自己。 Unfortunately, we've had the bug for a while, so I'm not sure how much code we'd break by changing it.不幸的是,我们已经有了一段时间的错误,所以我不确定通过更改它会破坏多少代码。 If we wanted to remove the requirement, that would be considered a language change and would have to go through the Swift Evolution Process.
如果我们想要删除该要求,那将被视为语言更改,并且必须通过Swift Evolution Process。
声明:本站的技术帖子网页,遵循CC BY-SA 4.0协议,如果您需要转载,请注明本站网址或者原文地址。任何问题请咨询:yoyou2525@163.com.