[英]JobPosting Structured Data
There seems to be a logical conflict in the definition of the JobPosting structured data here: https://developers.google.com/search/docs/data-types/job-postings . 此处的JobPosting结构化数据的定义似乎存在逻辑冲突: https : //developers.google.com/search/docs/data-types/job-postings 。 HiringOrganization is listed as a required property, and this requirement is corroborated by the fact that the structured data testing tool ( https://search.google.com/structured-data/testing-tool ) will not pop a "preview" button for a JobPosting unless the HiringOrganization property is both present and populated (more on that in a moment).
HiringOrganization被列为必填属性,并且结构化数据测试工具( https://search.google.com/structured-data/testing-tool )不会弹出“预览”按钮来证实这一要求除非HiringOrganization属性同时存在且已填充(稍后会对此进行详细介绍),否则为JobPosting。
However, on that same page, above, it's listed that an acceptable/valid posting example is "Recruiter ad with an apply flow where the company is unspecified. This is acceptable because the role is well-defined and the company does exist, even if it is not revealed. In this case, the hiringOrganization markup must be blank (see Misrepresentation of self, product, service, job or company)." 但是,在上面的同一页面上,列出了可接受/有效的发布示例是“未指定公司的带有申请流程的招聘广告。这是可以接受的,因为角色定义明确,并且公司确实存在,即使在这种情况下, hiringOrganization标记必须为空 (请参见虚假陈述的自我,产品,服务,职位或公司)。” [emphasis mine]
[强调我的]
I tried both leaving the hiringOrganization property out entirely and including the element but having blank values or whitespace values for the name property or even just having an empty set of quotes and no child properties. 我尝试将hiringOrganization属性完全排除在外,包括元素,但name属性具有空白值或空格值,甚至只是空的引号集而没有子属性。 In any of those cases, the preview button will not appear on the test tool (which makes me think that I also will not get a rich snippet in search results <--- this is the primary reason I'm attempting to add the structured data).
在任何一种情况下,预览按钮都不会出现在测试工具上(这使我认为我也不会在搜索结果中得到丰富的摘要<---这是我尝试添加结构化结构的主要原因数据)。
Can anyone confirm or deny my assumption about the correlation between "no preview in the structured data test" and "no rich snippet in search results?" 谁能证实或否认我对“结构化数据测试中没有预览”和“搜索结果中没有丰富摘要”之间的相关性的假设? Also, if anyone has any additional information on this apparent discrepancy and/or how to resolve it, I'd really appreciate it!
另外,如果有人对这个明显的差异和/或如何解决有任何其他信息,我将非常感谢!
Google has removed that sentence from their page and all references to "recruiters". Google已从他们的页面和所有“招聘人员”中删除了该句子。
It's subjective but that removal would imply to me that it is now an entirely required field and that they only want to accept job postings from the companies for which the roles are with. 这是主观的,但是撤离对我来说意味着它现在是一个必填字段,并且他们只希望接受其所在的公司的职位发布。 Ie no recruiters.
即没有招聘人员。
声明:本站的技术帖子网页,遵循CC BY-SA 4.0协议,如果您需要转载,请注明本站网址或者原文地址。任何问题请咨询:yoyou2525@163.com.