简体   繁体   English

JobPosting结构化数据

[英]JobPosting Structured Data

There seems to be a logical conflict in the definition of the JobPosting structured data here: https://developers.google.com/search/docs/data-types/job-postings . 此处的JobPosting结构化数据的定义似乎存在逻辑冲突: https : //developers.google.com/search/docs/data-types/job-postings HiringOrganization is listed as a required property, and this requirement is corroborated by the fact that the structured data testing tool ( https://search.google.com/structured-data/testing-tool ) will not pop a "preview" button for a JobPosting unless the HiringOrganization property is both present and populated (more on that in a moment). HiringOrganization被列为必填属性,并且结构化数据测试工具( https://search.google.com/structured-data/testing-tool )不会弹出“预览”按钮来证实这一要求除非HiringOrganization属性同时存在且已填充(稍后会对此进行详细介绍),否则为JobPosting。

However, on that same page, above, it's listed that an acceptable/valid posting example is "Recruiter ad with an apply flow where the company is unspecified. This is acceptable because the role is well-defined and the company does exist, even if it is not revealed. In this case, the hiringOrganization markup must be blank (see Misrepresentation of self, product, service, job or company)." 但是,在上面的同一页面上,列出了可接受/有效的发布示例是“未指定公司的带有申请流程的招聘广告。这是可以接受的,因为角色定义明确,并且公司确实存在,即使在这种情况下, hiringOrganization标记必须为空 (请参见虚假陈述的自我,产品,服务,职位或公司)。” [emphasis mine] [强调我的]

I tried both leaving the hiringOrganization property out entirely and including the element but having blank values or whitespace values for the name property or even just having an empty set of quotes and no child properties. 我尝试将hiringOrganization属性完全排除在外,包括元素,但name属性具有空白值或空格值,甚至只是空的引号集而没有子属性。 In any of those cases, the preview button will not appear on the test tool (which makes me think that I also will not get a rich snippet in search results <--- this is the primary reason I'm attempting to add the structured data). 在任何一种情况下,预览按钮都不会出现在测试工具上(这使我认为我也不会在搜索结果中得到丰富的摘要<---这是我尝试添加结构化结构的主要原因数据)。

Can anyone confirm or deny my assumption about the correlation between "no preview in the structured data test" and "no rich snippet in search results?" 谁能证实或否认我对“结构化数据测试中没有预览”和“搜索结果中没有丰富摘要”之间的相关性的假设? Also, if anyone has any additional information on this apparent discrepancy and/or how to resolve it, I'd really appreciate it! 另外,如果有人对这个明显的差异和/或如何解决有任何其他信息,我将非常感谢!

Google has removed that sentence from their page and all references to "recruiters". Google已从他们的页面和所有“招聘人员”中删除了该句子。

It's subjective but that removal would imply to me that it is now an entirely required field and that they only want to accept job postings from the companies for which the roles are with. 这是主观的,但是撤离对我来说意味着它现在是一个必填字段,并且他们只希望接受其所在的公司的职位发布。 Ie no recruiters. 即没有招聘人员。

暂无
暂无

声明:本站的技术帖子网页,遵循CC BY-SA 4.0协议,如果您需要转载,请注明本站网址或者原文地址。任何问题请咨询:yoyou2525@163.com.

相关问题 我的结构化数据类型应该是Product还是ItemPage? - Should my structured data type be Product or ItemPage? Google自定义搜索,结构化数据不起作用 - Google Custom Search, structured data not working 正确部署Google Rich Card的结构化数据 - Correct deployment of structured data for Google rich cards 结构化数据徽标在Google搜索中不可见 - Structured data logo is not visible in Google Search 是否可以在标准Google搜索中按微数据/结构化数据进行搜索? - Is it possible to search by microdata/structured data in a standard Google search? 如何使用Google的结构化数据内容显示电影时间表? - How to use Google's structured data content to display movie schedule? 网站未在搜索列表中显示评论结构化数据 - Site does not show review structured data in search listings Google搜索中“carousel”代码段的结构化数据:是否有必要将“ItemList”作为根元素? - Structured data for “carousel” snippet in Google Search: is it necessary to make “ItemList” the root element? 自 Google 更新以来的结构化数据(报价)无效:应提供报价或评论或聚合评级之一 - Invalid structured data (offer) since Google Update : one of offers or review or aggregateRating should be provided Google结构化数据错误:“为http://www.example.com/提供的所有值必须具有相同的域名。” - Google structured data error: “All values provided for http://www.example.com/ must have the same domain.”
 
粤ICP备18138465号  © 2020-2024 STACKOOM.COM