typedef int array [3]和typedef int（array）[3]有什么区别？

Question

I recently came across this unorthodox way to define a int array type:

typedef int(array)[3];

At first I thought it was an array of function pointers but then I realized that the * and the () were missing, so by looking into the code I deduced the type array was a int[3] type instead. I normally would declare this type as:

typedef int array[3];

Unless I'm mistaken that they are not the same thing, what is the advantage of doing so in the former way other than to make them look similar to a function pointer?

Answer 1

What is the difference between typedef int array[3] and typedef int(array)[3] ?

They are the same.

---

Parentheses could be used when a pointer is being declared, with * , and result in different types. In that case, parentheses could affect the precedence of [] or int . However, this is not your case here.

Answer 2

These are both equivalent. The parentheses do not alter the precedence of [] or int in this case.

The tool cdecl helps to confirm this:

• int (a)[3] gives "declare a as array 3 of int"
• int a[3] gives "declare a as array 3 of int"

Answer 3

If you run this code like this:

typedef int array[6];

array arr={1,2,3,4,5,6};
for(int i=0; i<6; i++)
     cout<<arr[i]<<" ";

And now you run this code like this:

typedef int (array)[6];
array arr={1,2,3,4,5,6};
for(int i=0; i<6; i++)
     cout<<arr[i]<<" ";

Both of those two types of code it generates the same output.This proves that both are same and the parentheses have no effect.