简体   繁体   English

在 Haskell 中查找多路树(玫瑰树)的给定节点的邻居数

[英]Finding the number of the neighbours of a given node of a multiway tree (rose tree) in Haskell

Consider the following definition of a Rose Tree: The tree can contains unique nodes.考虑以下玫瑰树的定义:树可以包含唯一的节点。

data NTree a = Nil | Node { root :: a, subtree :: [NTree a]} deriving Show
-- or just data NTree a = Nil | Node a [NTree a]

t1 :: NTree Int
t1 = Node 1 [Node 2 [ Node 5 [Nil], Node 6 [Nil], Node 7 [Nil]], Node 3 [Node 8 [Nil], Node 9 [Nil]], Node 4 [Nil]]
{-
t1:        1
        /  |  \
       /   |   \
     2     3     4
   / | \   | \
  5  6  7  8  9
-}

How to find the number of neighbours of a given node of a rose tree?如何找到玫瑰树的给定节点的邻居数? Examples what I mean:示例我的意思:

--Function that finds the number of the neighbours of a given node
neighboursOf :: (Eq a) => NTree a -> a -> Int
--Examples:
print (neighboursOf t1 3) -- -> 3 (The neighbours are 1,8 and 9)
print (neighboursOf t1 1) -- -> 3 (The neighbours are 2,3 and 4)
print (neighboursOf t1 8) -- -> 1 (The neighbour is 3)
print (neighboursOf t1 10) -- -> error "Not existing node"

I don't know how to implement the function我不知道如何实现 function

neighboursOf :: (Eq a) => NTree a -> a -> Int

Could you help me to implement the function?你能帮我实现 function 吗?

Edit: I came up with this solution:编辑:我想出了这个解决方案:

data NTree a = Nil | Node {root :: a, subtree :: [NTree a] } deriving (Show , Eq)

neighborsOf :: (Eq a) => NTree a -> a -> Int
neighborsOf Nil _ = error "Empty tree"
neighborsOf tree element
    | helper tree element True == 0 = error "No such element"
    | otherwise = helper tree element True

helper ::(Eq a) => NTree a -> a -> Bool -> Int
helper Nil _ _ = 0
helper tree el isSuperior
    | root tree == el && isSuperior && subtree tree == [Nil] = 0
    | root tree == el && isSuperior = length $ subtree tree
    | root tree == el && subtree tree == [Nil] = 1
    | root tree == el = length (subtree tree) + 1
    | otherwise = helper' (subtree tree) el
        where 
            helper' :: (Eq a) => [NTree a] -> a -> Int
            helper' [] _ = 0
            helper' (tree:subtrees) el = helper tree el False  + helper' subtrees el

And I think it is a very bad solution.而且我认为这是一个非常糟糕的解决方案。 Could you suggest to me some improvements?你能给我一些改进的建议吗?

OK now we can start thinking about it.好的,现在我们可以开始考虑了。 So your neighbors are either children, or a parent, of the node.所以你的邻居要么是节点的子节点,要么是节点的父节点。

You can write two separate functions, one is childrenOf:: Node -> [Node] , the other is parentOf:: Node -> [Node] , then use the two functions' results and combine them into the one you need.您可以编写两个单独的函数,一个是childrenOf:: Node -> [Node] ,另一个是parentOf:: Node -> [Node] ,然后使用这两个函数的结果并将它们组合成您需要的函数。 simple.简单的。 :) :)

There can only ever be one parent for a node in a tree, so why did I specify the list, [Node] , as the result of parentOf ?树中的节点只能有一个父节点,那么为什么我指定列表[Node]作为parentOf的结果? Can there be only one parent always?总是只有一个父母吗?

声明:本站的技术帖子网页,遵循CC BY-SA 4.0协议,如果您需要转载,请注明本站网址或者原文地址。任何问题请咨询:yoyou2525@163.com.

 
粤ICP备18138465号  © 2020-2024 STACKOOM.COM