MS SQL Server中访问与存储过程中的存储查询
[英]Stored Queries in access vs. Stored Procedure in MS SQL Server
问题描述
Is it correct to say that the Functionality of " stored queries " in MS access is the same with " stored Procedure " in MS SQL Server. 
可以肯定地说，MS访问中“ 存储查询 ”的功能与MS SQL Server中的“ 存储过程 ”相同。 Which one improve the Performance more? 哪一个可以更好地提高性能？
2 个解决方案
解决方案1
2 2012-07-26 10:00:14
A Sub or Function in a module is probably closer to a stored procedure than a query. 模块中的Sub或Function可能比查询更接近存储过程。 You can: 您可以：
- Execute one or more sql statements. 执行一个或多个sql语句。
- use flow-control and other logic 使用流控制和其他逻辑
- interact with objects outside of the database: files, email, execute programs etc. 与数据库之外的对象进行交互：文件，电子邮件，执行程序等。
- execute/use other sub routines and functions 执行/使用其他子例程和函数
A query has similarities to a view (except a view can't accept paramters and only executes a select statement), but is more like a table user-defined function (Without some of the flow control). 查询与视图具有相似性（除了视图不能接受参数并且仅执行select语句），但更像是表用户定义的函数（没有某些流控制）。
解决方案2
1 已采纳 2012-07-26 09:06:03
No, an Access query is much more limited than a stored procedure . 不，访问查询比存储过程要受限制得多。 The stored procedure may be better if you are working with an SQL Server back-end and want to do something complicated. 如果您正在使用SQL Server后端并想做一些复杂的事情，则存储过程可能会更好。
声明:本站的技术帖子网页，遵循CC BY-SA 4.0协议，如果您需要转载，请注明本站网址或者原文地址。任何问题请咨询:yoyou2525@163.com.