简体   繁体   中英

Why don't Scala primitives show up as type parameters in Java reflection?

Given the following case class:

case class Foo(
    bar: Int,
    baz: Boolean,
    qux: Option[Int],
    quux: Option[Boolean],
    quuux: Option[Integer]
)

I would expect the following:

for (f <- classOf[Foo].getDeclaredFields) {
    println(f.getGenericType)
}

to produce something like:

int
boolean
scala.Option<int>
scala.Option<boolean>
scala.Option<java.lang.Integer>

But instead, it produces:

int
boolean
scala.Option<java.lang.Object>
scala.Option<java.lang.Object>
scala.Option<java.lang.Integer>

Why do the primitives get erased from the generics, instead of getting treated as java.lang.Integer.TYPE and java.lang.Boolean.TYPE , as appears to happen with the plain fields?

And is there any way to retrieve the primitive type parameters from classOf[Foo] ?

Scala thinks that the generic parameter for primitives is scala.<Primitive> eg scala.Int . It doesn't store the type in the Java class file, though arguably it could. (Or not; depends on whether there needs to be a distinction between Int and java.lang.Integer ; under the hood the boxed form is java.lang.Integer , even if the compiler does a good job making you believe it is Int .)

Anyway, Scala has its own reflection capabilities which are in flux, but with 2.10 you can find the arguments of the Option types like so:

import scala.reflect.runtime.universe._
typeTag[Foo].tpe.members.collect{
  case m: MethodSymbol if m.isCaseAccessor => m 
}.foreach(m => println(m.name + " " + m.typeSignature))

and you'll get something like

quuux => scala.Option[java.lang.Integer]
quux => scala.Option[scala.Boolean]
qux => scala.Option[scala.Int]
baz => scala.Boolean
bar => scala.Int

The technical post webpages of this site follow the CC BY-SA 4.0 protocol. If you need to reprint, please indicate the site URL or the original address.Any question please contact:yoyou2525@163.com.

 
粤ICP备18138465号  © 2020-2024 STACKOOM.COM