Why can @Repeatable Annotations not be inherited from interfaces

Question

In Java annotations marked as @Inherited will only work when annotating classes:

Note that this meta-annotation type has no effect if the annotated type is used to annotate anything other than a class. Note also that this meta-annotation only causes annotations to be inherited from superclasses; annotations on implemented interfaces have no effect.

So interfaces or methods annotated with an @Inherited annotation will not result in implementing classes/methods to also be annotated with the annotation. The reason for this is most likely, that the compiler would'n know which of the annotations to choose, if there are multiple annotations in the class hierarchy as described here .

Now Java 8 introduced the new annotation @Repeatable . I think it would have been natural to remove the above restrictions for annotations that are both marked as @Inherited and @Repeatable , because the compiler should then be able to add the conflicting annotations to the @Repeatable annotation.

Given the following example:

import java.lang.annotation.Inherited;
import java.lang.annotation.Repeatable;
import java.lang.annotation.Retention;
import java.lang.annotation.RetentionPolicy;
import java.lang.annotation.Target;

@Retention(RetentionPolicy.RUNTIME)
@Target(ElementType.TYPE)
@Inherited
@interface RepeatableAnnotations {
    RepeatableAnnotation[] value(); 
}

@Retention(RetentionPolicy.RUNTIME)
@Target(ElementType.TYPE)
@Inherited
@Repeatable(RepeatableAnnotations.class)
@interface RepeatableAnnotation {
    String value();
}

@RepeatableAnnotation("A")
interface IntefaceA {}

@RepeatableAnnotation("B")
interface IntefaceB {}

@RepeatableAnnotation("C")
@RepeatableAnnotation("D")
public class TestClass implements IntefaceA, IntefaceB {
    public static void main(String[] args) {
        for (RepeatableAnnotation a : TestClass.class.getAnnotation(RepeatableAnnotations.class).value()) {
            System.out.print(a.value());
        }
    }
}

I would have hoped the output to be ABCD but it is "just" CD (ie @Inherited is working exactly like pre Java 8).

Does anyone know if there was good reason for not removing the @Inherited restrictions regarding interfaces and methods in the case of @Repeatable annotations for Java 8?

Is there any workaround to achieve the ABCD output for the above type hierarchy? (other than using reflection to scan the super interfaces for annotations...)

Answer 1

Please recall the documentation of @Inherited :

If an Inherited meta-annotation is present on an annotation type declaration, and the user queries the annotation type on a class declaration, and the class declaration has no annotation for this type , then the class's superclass will automatically be queried for the annotation type.

In other words, @Inherited never was intended to be a feature for collecting multiple annotations on a type hierarchy. Instead, you will get the annotation of the most specific type which has an explicit annotation.

In other words, if you change your declaration to

@RepeatableAnnotation("FOO") @RepeatableAnnotation("BAR") class Base {}

@RepeatableAnnotation("C") @RepeatableAnnotation("D")
public class TestClass extends Base implements IntefaceA, IntefaceB {

it won't change the result; FOO and BAR of Base are not inherited by TestClass as it has the explicit annotation values C and D .

Expanding this to the interface hierarchy would be awkward due to the multiple inheritance and the fact that a super-interface may turn out to be a sub-interface of another super-interface so finding the most specific one is not trivial. This differs heavily from the linear search of the superclass hierarchy.

You may encounter the situation where multiple unrelated annotated interface s exist but it's not clear why this ambiguity should be resolved by joining them into one repeated annotation. This would not harmonize with the behavior in all other scenarios.

---

Note that the answer you have linked is a bit odd as it shows code using a method annotation but method annotations are never inherited, regardless of whether you specified @Inherited or not (an audit tool should generate a warning when you combine @Target(ElementType.METHOD) with @Inherited , imho). @Inherited is relevant for type annotations only.