Is the following code right:
var user = prompt("Is programming awesome?").toUpperCase();
switch (user) {
case 'HELL YEAH' || 'YES' || 'YEAH' || 'YEP' || 'YEA':
console.log("That's what I'd expected!");
break;
case 'KINDA'||'CANT SAY':
console.log("Oh, you'd like it when you'll be a pro!");
break;
case 'HELL NO'||'NO'||'NAH'||'NOPE'||'NA':
console.log("You can't say that!");
break;
default:
console.log("Wacha tryna say mate?");
break;
}
I tried it. But it didn't work as I wanted it to. It worked well if the input was 'hell no' or 'hell yeah', but all the later strings were just ignored!
I would approach this using a dictionary (object) containing your answers which you can then check with a function in the switch statement. It's a lot neater than having multiple case checks:
var user = prompt("Is programming awesome?").toUpperCase(); // 'HELL YEAH';
// 'dictionary' is just a JS object that has key/value pairs
// In this instance we have keys that map the case checks you were
// making and each has a corresponding array for its value, filled with
// the OR checks you wanted to make.
// We pass 'dict' in as the second parameter when we call checkAnswer
var dict = {
yes: ['HELL YEAH', 'YES', 'YEAH', 'YEP', 'YEA'],
maybe: ['KINDA', 'CANT SAY'],
no: ['HELL NO', 'NO', 'NAH', 'NOPE', 'NA']
};
// checkAnswer returns 'yes' for the user prompt 'HELL YEAH'
// It loops over the 'dict' object and if it finds an instance of
// your user input in one of the arrays it returns the key
// in this instance 'yes' for 'HELL YEAH' (indexOf returns 0)
// otherwise it returns false (for your 'default' case)
function checkAnswer(user, dict) {
for (var p in dict) {
if (dict[p].indexOf(user) > -1) return p;
}
return false;
}
// All we do is use checkAnswer to return the key where
// the user input is found in one of the dictionary arrays.
// That will always be a single string which is what switch expects
switch (checkAnswer(user, dict)) {
case 'yes':
console.log("That's what I'd expected!");
break;
case 'maybe':
console.log("Oh, you'd like it when you'll be a pro!");
break;
case 'no':
console.log("You can't say that!");
break;
default:
console.log("Wacha tryna say mate?");
break;
}
I guess you have to do :
var user = prompt("Is programming awesome?").toUpperCase();
switch (user) {
case 'HELL YEAH':
case 'YES':
case 'YEAH':
case 'YEP':
case 'YEA':
console.log("That's what I'd expected!");
break;
case 'KINDA':
...
}
And so on...
The Javascript switch has a fall-through behaviour, you can leverage this to obtain what you described:
var user = prompt("Is programming awesome?").toUpperCase();
switch (user) {
case 'HELL YEAH':
case 'YES':
case 'YEAH':
case 'YEP'
case 'YEA':
console.log("That's what I'd expected!");
break;
case 'KINDA':
case 'CANT SAY':
console.log("Oh, you'd like it when you'll be a pro!");
break;
case 'HELL NO':
case 'NO':
case 'NAH':
case 'NOPE':
case 'NA':
console.log("You can't say that!");
break;
default:
console.log("Wacha tryna say mate?");
break;
}
Not fancy as using an or operator but it works. With fall-through, execution of the specific case
will go down skipping the not matching ones in the same group until some real code is reached.
No, but in C++, Java etc you can do the following:
switch (a_variable) {
case CONST_1:
case CONST_2:
case CONST_3:
do_something();
break;
case CONST_4:
do_some_stuff();
break;
dafeult:
do_default_stuff();
break;
}
This is like an or
for switch-case
. This should work in JS too ^^
Group cases without break.
var user = prompt("Is programming awesome?").toUpperCase();
switch (user) {
case 'HELL YEAH':
case 'YES':
case 'YEAH':
case 'YEP':
case 'YEA':
console.log("That's what I'd expected!");
break;
case 'KINDA':
case 'CANT SAY':
console.log("Oh, you'd like it when you'll be a pro!");
break;
case 'HELL NO':
case 'NO':
case 'NAH':
case 'NOPE':
case 'NA':
console.log("You can't say that!");
break;
default:
console.log("Wacha tryna say mate?");
break;
}
I believe the switch has to match its cases to a String, so the || operator wouldn't work.
You can however have multiple cases define the same outcome, which you can do by ommitting the break;
.
switch(word) {
case "yes":
case "yeah":
goThroughWithIt();
break;
case "no":
case "nuh uh":
abort();
break;
}
I think you should modify as follows:
var user = prompt("Is programming awesome?").toUpperCase();
switch (user) {
case 'HELL YEAH':
case 'YES':
case 'YEAH':
case 'YEP':
case 'YEA':
console.log("That's what I'd expected!");
break;
case 'KINDA':
case 'CANT SAY':
console.log("Oh, you'd like it when you'll be a pro!");
break;
case 'HELL NO':
case'NO':
case'NAH':
case'NOPE':
case'NA':
console.log("You can't say that!");
break;
default:
console.log("Wacha tryna say mate?");
break;
}
The technical post webpages of this site follow the CC BY-SA 4.0 protocol. If you need to reprint, please indicate the site URL or the original address.Any question please contact:yoyou2525@163.com.