简体   繁体   中英

Why C++ does not allow function parameters used for default values latter parameters?

This is a follow-up on this question . The code in the OP question there looked quite reasonable and unambiguous to me. Why does not C++ allow using former parameters to define default values of latter parameters, something like this:

int foo( int a, int b = a );

Also, at least in C++11 declared types of parameters can be used to determine the return type, so it's not unheard of to use function parameters in similar manner:

auto bar( int a ) -> decltype( a );

Thus the question: what are the reason(s) why the above declaration of foo is not allowed?

For one thing, this would require that a is evaluated before b , but C++ (like C) does not define the order of evaluation for function parameters.

You can still get the effect you want by adding an overload:

int foo(int a, int b)
{ /* do something */ }

int foo(int a)
{ return foo(a, a); }

The technical post webpages of this site follow the CC BY-SA 4.0 protocol. If you need to reprint, please indicate the site URL or the original address.Any question please contact:yoyou2525@163.com.

 
粤ICP备18138465号  © 2020-2024 STACKOOM.COM