I'm working on consuming an API which exposes an object at multiple layers within it's response. For example for some responses we get back a:
{
"error": {
"code": "123",
"description": "Description"
}
}
But in other situations it response with:
{
"data": [
{
"message_id": "123",
"error": {
"code": "123",
"description": "Description"
}
}
]
}
In both cases the error object is identical and in both case I don't actually care about the rest of the payload. I was hoping to use the \\\\ recursive JsPath operator, however the implementation below fails:
case class ErrorMessage(code: String, description: String)
implicit val errorMessageFormat = Json.format[ErrorMessage]
case class ErrorResponse(errors: Seq[ErrorMessage])
implicit val errorResponseFormat: Format[ErrorResponse] = Format(
(__ \\ "error").read[Seq[ErrorMessage]].map(ErrorResponse),
(__ \ "errors").write[Seq[ErrorMessage]].contramap((r: ErrorResponse) => r.errors)
)
This gives an error:
JsError(List((//error,List(ValidationError(List(error.expected.jsarray),WrappedArray())))))
I understand why: The (__ \\\\ "error")
returns a Seq[JsValue]
, where as my read call is expecting a JsArray
.
Is there a nice way a round this?
Since the first piece is already a Seq, just map the internal elements as you would map single objects. I'm not very familiar with the framework (I use Json4s myself mostly), but by your description sounds like
ErrorResponse((__ \\ "error").map(_.read[Seq[ErrorMessage]]))
Should be closer to what you want. (__ \\\\ "error")
gives you a Seq
of JsValues
, map
does something for every JsValue
, read
converts a single JsValue
to an ErrorMessage
and the resulting Seq[ErrorMessage]
you pass to the ErrorResponse
constructor.
So for anyone trying to do something similar, the below works.
val errorResponseReads = Reads[ErrorResponse] { value: JsValue =>
val errorsJsArray: JsArray = JsArray(value \\ "error")
errorsJsArray.validate[Seq[ErrorMessage]].map(ErrorResponse)
}
The format then becomes:
implicit val errorResponseFormat: Format[ErrorResponse] = Format(
errorResponseReads,
(__ \ "errors").write[Seq[ErrorMessage]].contramap((r: ErrorResponse) => r.errors)
)
Basically you need to define Reads that you use explicitly. In the reads you can then use the recursive search to return a Seq[JsValue]
and then create a JsArray
that can be validated as normal.
This works fine, it would be nice if we didn't have to define a separate Reads[T] though.
The technical post webpages of this site follow the CC BY-SA 4.0 protocol. If you need to reprint, please indicate the site URL or the original address.Any question please contact:yoyou2525@163.com.