Say I have an abstract class
/**@constructor
* @abstract*/
function AbsFoo(){}
/**@return {number}
* @param {number} a
* @param {number} b */
AbsFoo.prototype.aPlusB = function(a,b){
return a + b
};
/**@abstract
* @return {number}
* @param {number} c
* @param {number} d */
AbsFoo.prototype.cMinusD = function(c,d){}; //extending class need to implement.
and i want to extend this class, normally, I would do something like
/**@constructor
* @extends {AbsFoo} */
function Foo(){
AbsFoo.apply(this);
}
Foo.prototype = new AbsFoo();
Foo.prototype.constructor = Foo;
Foo.prototype.doSomething = function(c,d){
return c - d;
};
But closure compiler says
JSC_INSTANTIATE_ABSTRACT_CLASS: cannot instantiate abstract class
refering to the line Foo.prototype = new AbsFoo();
So how would I do this in a way that would keep the prototype inheritance, and the ability to use instanceof
all the way up the class chain, but also make the compiler happy?
I use goog.inherits
in this situation. Since you don't want to use closure library you could copy just goog.inherits
from closure-library/closure/goog/base.js . Maybe give it the name googInherits
. The code is then something like this:
/**@constructor
* @extends {AbsFoo}
*/
Foo = function(){
AbsFoo.apply(this);
}
googInherits(Foo, AbsFoo);
/** @inheritDoc */
Foo.prototype.cMinusD = function(c,d){
return c - d;
};
The technical post webpages of this site follow the CC BY-SA 4.0 protocol. If you need to reprint, please indicate the site URL or the original address.Any question please contact:yoyou2525@163.com.