I would like to make some template functions work with existing template-struct helpers. However template argument deduction fails. Is there a work-around?
This overloaded operator <<
compiles and works:
template <typename T>
inline typename std::vector<T>&
operator<<(
typename std::vector<T>& vec,
const typename std::vector<T>::value_type& val)
{
vec.push_back(val);
return vec;
}
But when I try to use a helper struct
this doesn't compile:
template<typename T>
struct Vector
{
typedef std::vector<T> Type;
};
template <typename T>
inline typename Vector<T>::Type&
operator<<(
typename Vector<T>::Type& vec,
const typename Vector<T>::Type::value_type& val)
{
vec.push_back(val);
return vec;
}
gcc error:
error: no match for 'operator<<' (operand types are 'std::vector<int>' and 'int')
...
note: candidate:
'template<class T> typename Vector<T>::Type& operator<<
(typename Vector<T>::Type&, const typename Vector<T>::Type::value_type&)'
operator<<(
^~~~~~~~
note: template argument deduction/substitution failed:
note: couldn't deduce template parameter 'T'
clang error:
error: invalid operands to binary expression ('std::vector<int>' and 'int')
vec << int(2);
~~~ ^ ~~~~~~
note: candidate template ignored: couldn't infer template argument 'T'
operator<<(
^
c++03
work-around for this case? Alias templates would solve the problem in c++11
. Note: In my real problem second parameter is not necessarily T
and I can't use it to deduce vector type.
Note 2: the real helper struct contains some platform specific pre-processing and looks something like:
template <class T>
struct Helper
{
#if defined(_WIN32_WCE)
typedef std::vector<T, WMHeapAllocator<T> > Vector;
#else
typedef std::vector<T> Vector;
#endif
};
This is a Non-deduced contexts , which is not restricted to C++03. See my previous answer Template parameter cannot be deduced .
As for a workaround, you need to make one of the argument in the function where T
can be deduced. Once it is deduced from one place, compiler will use it in other places.
In your case, if you can be sure that value_type
will be T
, then use this will work:
template <typename T>
inline typename Vector<T>::Type&
operator<<(
typename Vector<T>::Type& vec,
const T& val)
{
vec.push_back(val);
return vec;
}
Here T
is deduced from second argument, and used in the first.
EDIT ( to reflect the edit of question )
You don't need a helper class, a template template solution might be better:
template<template<typename, typename> class Container, class T, class U>
inline Container<T, U>&
operator<<(
Container<T, U>& vec,
const typename Container<T, U>::value_type& val)
{
vec.push_back(val);
return vec;
}
The technical post webpages of this site follow the CC BY-SA 4.0 protocol. If you need to reprint, please indicate the site URL or the original address.Any question please contact:yoyou2525@163.com.